:doh:
I know you were saying it didn't, I was asking you how it could have, i.e. how it would have if God did not create it.
And now you've made another baseless assertion: that the clock started at creation. You can't show that to be the case, and, in fact, logic shows that not to be the case because in order for God to even begin to create He must have experienced the passage of individual moments, from one to the next, in sequential order.
You're the one who said that time wasn't created.You and your cohorts have said that God exists in time has no foreknowledge is not Omniscient. You and your o-viewers are the ones that say that God does not exist outside of time (which means before time began). You can't prove it Biblically. In fact the God of the Bible has all of the attributes that you open view philosophers deny. Eternality.
Again you make God the same as man. We experience time in sequence. God created that sequence.
e·ter·nal (-tûrnl)
adj.
1. Being without beginning or end; existing outside of time. See Synonyms at infinite.
2. Continuing without interruption; perpetual.
3. Forever true or changeless: eternal truths.
4. Seemingly endless; interminable. See Synonyms at ageless, continual.
5. Of or relating to spiritual communion with God, especially in the afterlife.
n.
1. Something timeless, uninterrupted, or endless.
2. Eternal God. Used with the.
Jude 1:25Jude 1:25
New International Version (NIV)
25 to the only God our Savior be glory, majesty, power and authority, through Jesus Christ our Lord, before all ages, now and forevermore! Amen.
Where are your definitions from? I can find sources in conservative, evangelical encyclopedias that are not Open Theist that define eternity as endless time, not timelessness. There is great debate in the literature about A vs B theory of time, timeless vs endless duration, etc. You have simply cherry picked a source that holds the traditional view, but does not defend it nor interact with those with strong arguments against it.
wiki? Try quoting a peer reviewed journal. There are arguments for and against timelessness that get more complicated than you will ever know.
It isn't that we are capable of knowing or understanding God, since He's decided to hide Himself behind His Mystery; but He has chosen for us to debate these things to keep us interested in, talking about and calling upon Him.
No thanks. That's what got you so screwed up.
Besides when the plain truth makes sense it doesn't need to be turned into anything else.
When the plain sense makes good sense seek no other sense.
------------------------------
Romans 1:19-21
19 because what may be known of God is manifest in them, for God has shown it to them. 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse, 21 because, although they knew God, they did not glorify Him as God, nor were thankful, but became futile in their thoughts, and their foolish hearts were darkened.
Not the issue, you twit!This is fun! Do a word search at Biblegateway. Here is what I found that the Bible says God is eternal.
God had no beginning, and yet He experienced duration.No LOGIC shows precisely the opposite. Time had to begin at the moment of creation. A timeline prior to creation would have had no beginning. Getting to the moment of creation from any point on an infinite line would have required an infinite amount of time. Zeno's paradox shows that infinite regressive time is inherently irrational.
God is living, He moved and moves.Time as "change" can be observed in the universe God made because everything is in motion. There was no motion before anything existed. In what respect could any changes be occurring? Is it God Himself who was sequentially changing and evolving? Why would He need to change. What would have caused the changes? Had this been going on forever.
J.R. Lucas in 'A treatise on time and space' answers Zeno's paradox by distinguishing intervals and instants (the bottom line is that the arrow reaches the target despite philosopher's navel gazing).
Ignorant fool.All you need to read and know is the Bible.
All of this open theism crap is all over the internet as a false teaching. I know it's false just by its title...:jawdrop:
Ignorant fool.
How about you let us know when you have some actual Scripture that shows the open view to be false...
No you haven't. At most you've argued from silence.I already did you dimwit.
No you haven't. At most you've argued from silence.
All you need to read and know is the Bible.
All of this open theism crap is all over the internet as a false teaching. I know it's false just by its title...:jawdrop:
2 Timothy 4:3