Pornographers protest pornography

[Crucible]

False. In modern leftist-run, feminist-neutered society, drunken women get a pass that no drunken man gets. The woman is at no point considered responsible for herself; the man is responsible for both.

It's a direction society is unfortunately going, but it's not the case in a courtroom.

Yet

 

[randomvim]

feel free to :idunno:

will do. no need to discriminate and belittle mentally challenged individuals whilst making a poor comment about another person being evil or such

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk

 

[ok doser]

...no need to discriminate and belittle mentally challenged individuals ...

i wasn't doing that

 

[glassjester]

will do. no need to discriminate and belittle mentally challenged individuals whilst making a poor comment about another person being evil or such

Sent from my LG-K330 using Tapatalk

He's not going to stop saying "retard," man.

 

[ok doser]

He's not going to stop saying "retard," man.

as well, i will vigorously defend those who are developmentally delayed (we don't call them retards anymore) or otherwise physically or mentally challenged

 

[randomvim]

i wasn't doing that

if you use that word, you are. you comparing an evil person to that of someone who is mentally ill (whether from birth or due to an event) and may pertain no evil deed.

again, your words.
" i'd have used 'evil' or 'retarded' or 'condemned to burn in hell for eternity' "

so by quick examination, those words or descriptions are interchangable. you would use either one for the same person.

you see no flaw in that?

Ill leave it hear since this is not even thread topic, but please refrain from such inappropriate and incorrect usage. especially if you "defend" mentally challenged individuals despite your ealier post identifies them as "evil" or " condemned to burn in hell..."

Tapatalk

 

[ok doser]

if you use that word, you are.

well, no i'm not

you may choose to see it that way, but it doesn't affect my intent


you are welcome to define your own reality all you like

but you don't get to define mine

 

[musterion]

Retarded just means slowed or delayed. It does not necessarily mean cognitively but leftists are invariably morally retarded, which in turn darkens their thinking. That is right out of Romans chapter 1.

 

[ok doser]

...leftists are invariably morally retarded....

they're also intellectually retarded, seeking the government to treat them like children

 

[musterion]

they're also intellectually retarded, seeking the government to treat them like children

Good point, but for me that still falls under moral retardation, which always leads to all manner of iniquity. Many seem emotionally retarded, though.

 

[ok doser]

Good point, but for me that still falls under moral retardation, which always leads to all manner of iniquity. Many seem emotionally retarded, though.

would that include the hillary supporters who cried for months?

 

[musterion]

Yes. Yes it would.

 

[Nihilo]

Unfortunately or not, you can't say about a word that it means what I say and not what you hear. They're going to keep on hearing what they're already hearing, they're not going to change. They're retarded.

 

[Arthur Brain]

He's not going to stop saying "retard," man.

Well of course he isn't, just like there's those who continue to give that type of trolling a free pass and indulge in it themselves, either directly or indirectly and pass it off as being 'moral'.

So it goes...

 

[glassjester]

Well of course he isn't, just like there's those who continue to give that type of trolling a free pass and indulge in it themselves, either directly or indirectly and pass it off as being 'moral'.

So it goes...

Passing off name-calling as moral? Strange.

 

[glassjester]

Although I guess it has its place in certain situations.

 

[ok doser]

seems to me that name-calling is appropriate when it's used appropriately :idunno:

1. Ye blind guides (Matt. 23:16). 2. Ye fools (Matt. 23:17). 3. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees…for ye are like whited supulchres…full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness (Matt. 23:27). 4. Ye serpents (Matt. 23:33). 5. Ye generation of vipers (Matt. 23:33). 6. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! (Luke 11:44). 7. Ye are as graves which appear not (Luke 11:44). https://bible.org/illustration/names-jesus-called-scribes-and-pharisees

 

[glassjester]

seems to me that name-calling is appropriate when it's used appropriately :idunno:

1. Ye blind guides (Matt. 23:16). 2. Ye fools (Matt. 23:17). 3. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees…for ye are like whited supulchres…full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness (Matt. 23:27). 4. Ye serpents (Matt. 23:33). 5. Ye generation of vipers (Matt. 23:33). 6. Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! (Luke 11:44). 7. Ye are as graves which appear not (Luke 11:44). https://bible.org/illustration/names-jesus-called-scribes-and-pharisees

Right, "appropriate" being the qualifier in dispute, I'm sure.

 

[ok doser]

Right, "appropriate" being the qualifier in dispute, I'm sure.

"retard" gets a better response than "fools"

 

[glassjester]

"retard" gets a better response than "fools"

What kind of response do you hope to get, and why?