the fat lady has been singing for years now to allow folks to kill babies. We need to drown out her voice with our own song.The fat lady has not yet sang.
WAIT....
There is more to this story.
Apparently the grand jury was influenced by a prosector with an agenda. It should be interesting when we hear the tapes or see transcript of everything.
The fat lady has not yet sang.
Many people know why Margret Sanger created Planned Parenthood from her own words.Oh, but of course! It can't be that PP didn't break any laws, whereas the CMP people did. No......it can't be that. Never.....never.....
It's reflective of the same mindset we see in the creationism debates. Apparently in right-wing Christian world, being dishonest and breaking laws are just fine if done for a righteous cause.
And the irony here is how often they chastise Muslims for verses in the Quran that say lying is ok, as long as it's for Allah.
I've heard she was for forced sterilization of what she considered to be undesirables also.Many people know why Margret Sanger created Planned Parenthood from her own words.
_____
Woman, Morality, and Birth Control. New York: New York Publishing Company, 1922. Page 12.
We should hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. We don’t want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.
_____
But, as long as that is legal, you like it.
I understand why you would want to make this about the larger issue of abortion...
I've heard she was for forced sterilization of what she considered to be undesirables also.
I understand why you would want to make this about the larger issue of abortion. But that's not what this thread is about.
The reality on the ground right now is that abortion is legal, and Planned Parenthood provides completely legal services to women who want them.
The ability to order fetal body parts from a drop-down menu on a website is ok
but exposing it is inappropriate.
Deceptively practicing partial birth abortion for the purposes of safeguarding particular tissues and organs that certain buyers want isn't considered "dishonest"
but posing as a fetal organ "buyer" is considered dishonest.
"You talk with my litigation and law folks, anything that's going to the Supreme Court right now, we are all losers. But I will tell you that behind closed doors these conversations are happening with the affiliates." Dr. Nucatela
"Closed door" conversations designed to circumvent federal law is considered "ethical" but "registering false identities" (the equivalent of a "fake ID) is unethical.
I think the real story is that the political left is seeking to punish CMP for exposing the truth.
Well said.I see, I think I am finally seeing inside the mindset of the Planned Parenthood culture of death.
The ability to order fetal body parts from a drop-down menu on a website is ok, but exposing it is inappropriate.
"The Federal [Partial Birth] Abortion Ban is a law, and laws are up to interpretation. So if I say on day one I do not intend to do this, what ultimately happens doesn't matter" -Dr. Nukatela
Deceptively practicing partial birth abortion for the purposes of safeguarding particular tissues and organs that certain buyers want isn't considered "dishonest" but posing as a fetal organ "buyer" is considered dishonest.
"You talk with my litigation and law folks, anything that's going to the Supreme Court right now, we are all losers. But I will tell you that behind closed doors these conversations are happening with the affiliates." Dr. Nucatela
"Closed door" conversations designed to circumvent federal law isn't considered "ethical" but "registering false identities" (the equivalent of a "fake ID) is unethical.
I think the real story is that the political left is seeking to punish CMP for exposing the truth.
But, as long as that is legal, you like it.
The "Nonhuman Rights Project" says that plants have "a right to evolve"!the thread's about planned parenthood, whose core mission is the murder of babies
Right, we wouldn't want to be inconvenienced by any inefficiency while purchasing human body parts, would we?Yes, some folks made the logistical process of procuring tissue for scientific research more efficient.
I think the fact that conservative members of congress finally got the point and started the ball rolling on de-funding Planned Parenthood means that their methods were quite effective in exposing the truth and that angered the liberals, consequently Planned Parenthood sues CMP and now we have Grand Jury indictments for fake id's…Jose Fly said:First, if it was on a website why did CMP need to go through all the theater of fake identities, fake documents, and undercover videos to "expose" it? Just send out a link to the website. :duh:
First, the falsification of a "government document" is probably registering paperwork for a dummy corporation for the purposes of the investigation and the "Record tampering" is likely from having a fake ID made which resemble California driver's licenses (which one out of every 10 underage college students probably has in their possession).Jose Fly said:Second, they weren't indicted for merely exposing anything. They were indicted for falsifying government documents and attempting to acquire human tissues via prohibited means. Do you think those things should be legal?
And here we have the ultimate standard of morality as defined by soft-headed liberal conformists.Josy Fly said:Yet no crimes were committed by PP.
I think the punishment should fit the crime.Jose Fly said:They falsified government documents, which is a crime. Do you think that shouldn't be a crime?
Right, we wouldn't want to be inconvenienced by any inefficiency while purchasing human body parts, would we?
I think the fact that conservative members of congress finally got the point and started the ball rolling on de-funding Planned Parenthood means that their methods were quite effective in exposing the truth
First, the falsification of a "government document" is probably registering paperwork for a dummy corporation for the purposes of the investigation and the "Record tampering" is likely from having a fake ID made which resemble California driver's licenses (which one out of every 10 underage college students probably has in their possession).
How many "Grand Jury" indictments have you read about for college students trying to get into a night-club using a fake California Driver's license?
Where is the media circus surrounding those breaking news stories?
These charges are punitive for daring to expose the truths about Planned Parenthood, and it is obvious that Planned Parenthood didn't want the public to know about much of what happens behind closed doors at the organization.
What we have here is a failure to understand the nature of the journalistic investigation. For example, why aren't the U.S. and French governments treating Anne Erelle as a terrorist? Why isn't she considered an enemy of the state?
Because she wasn't really interested in becoming a terrorist. :duh:
You don't seriously think that CMP representatives were actually trying to buy fetal tissue for their fake medical research company, do you?
Yes, I am against conducting medical research on a murder victim who had no chance to consent to their body being used for research.Ok, so you're against conducting medical research on fetal tissues. We'll just disagree
Can you read?Jose Fly said:Not sure what "truth" you think they exposed, but at least you admit it was a political stunt.
And your blind and mindless obedience is showing. Partial birth abortion is considered by you to be moral while making a fake ID is considered a "crime."Jose Fly said:Right. When your team breaks the law it's a big *shrug*. Your tribalism is noted.
Yes, they were acting deceptively.Jose Fly said:So they were lying? At least you admit they were dishonestly trying to set up and bait PP staff.
I'm disappointed that our Government didn't uphold the law and instead folded to political pressure.Jose Fly said:You're probably very disappointed they didn't fall for it.
Jose Fly said:As far as the rest of your post, like I said earlier, I'm not interested in debating the legality of abortion.
Can you read?
"We have independent collegues who generate a fair amount of income doing this..."
"I have been talking to the executive director of the national abortion federation, we're trying to figure this out as an industry about how we are going to handle remuneration because the headlines would be a disaster." -- Deb Vanderhei, National Director, Consortium of Abortion Providers
What do you think that Verderhei was so nervous about?
Yes, they were acting deceptively.
Undercover, investigating journalist often do so in order to give the journalist access. As such, Erelle was lying when she pretended to be interested in joining ISIS.
I'm disappointed that our Government didn't uphold the law and instead folded to political pressure.
I think this perfectly sums up the issue. Murder is completely shrug-worthy.What other crimes are just shrug-worthy, while we're at it? Murder? Arson? Vandalism? Conspiring to blow up a clinic?
Can her colleagues generate a fair amount of income by being reimbursed for their expenses?Looks to me like she was talking about the fact that PP would be reimbursed for their expenses (rremunerate and reimburse are synonyms).
No, of course not!Jose Fly said:If you truly think PP and ISIS are equivalent, I'll just let that speak for itself.
The federal law that prohibits the sale of aborted fetal body parts and organs, which some providers apparently "generate a fair amount of income."Jose Fly said:What law do you believe they didn't uphold?