I am trying to get people to think about this logically. That will work a lot better if we step away from the emotionally charged COVID Mask topic, and look at it in a more general way.
After asking a good question Chair will always disengage after encountering even small resistance.
Chair was already shown how masks don't help much. He was kind enough to provide the studies that showed they don't help much. So as far as COVID is concerned, requiring masks is an overreach of government at the very least. And people being worried about being injected, by force, with "trust us it's good for you" vaccines as a natural progression of this overreach is a valid concern that Chair won't discuss logically or rationally.
But Chair is not stupid. He brings up a principle that the governments job is to produce justice. And, it would be unjust to let a person into society that would harm people at random and without intent. In other words a person would be negligent homicide in avoiding harm to people when they knew harm was a possibility.
So, based on this principle we need to ask Chair at least one simple question. He never answers because for all his displays of intelligence and fair play, he's rather irrational.
These questions are: since this principle applies to the flu, how do we stop the government from controlling every aspect of everyone's life? If you don't know, do you realize that is also negligent homicide if someone dies from a policy you support and you are wrong?
