And so, what parts of scripture was not understood while people were speaking in tongues?
It'll be funny watching you attempt to explain this.
why don't you tell us ? slip into a trance and speak in tongues of spirit; that's perfect -:carryon:
And so, what parts of scripture was not understood while people were speaking in tongues?
It'll be funny watching you attempt to explain this.
And so, what parts of scripture was not understood while people were speaking in tongues?
It'll be funny watching you attempt to explain this.
:chuckle:
Just as I thought.
"It's true. That's why we have nonsense like mad, and why there are cessationists. Human interpretation."-andycain
Is your "Just as I thought" a "human interpretation, or a "God interpretation?"
Hey, John?
Why do you think there are so many denominations if that which is perfect is talking about the word of God?
Common sense.
Paul doesn't talk about two distinctly different gospels, and he also complemented the Corinthians for not lacking in spiritual gifts as the waited for Christ's appearing.
We're still waiting for Christ's appearing, and so shouldn't be lacking in the gifts.
To deny this, is to trust in human/carnal interpretation.
Hey, John?
Why do you think there are so many denominations if that which is perfect is talking about the word of God?
If it's so perfect, why do so many people disagree?
Because people are imperfect?
If the weakness is human imperfection, especially where faith, hardness of heart, ignorance, defiance, human interpretation, lack of discernment etc are concerned, then that which is perfect cannot be completely understood perfectly. Which is why we're supposed to grow in the knowledge of God, it isn't all immediately understood in one go.
The slug still does not get the difference between objective revelation, given by objective words, which are perfect, true, sound, "infallible," and illumination/understanding/interpretation, which, in this dispensation, currently, is made by fallible members of the boc, and is imperfect, fallible.
Slower: the word of God is perfect; our interpretation is not.
Are/were you drunk, on the "Holy Ghost Bartender" "spirit," or is it the "spirit of Jack Daniels, when you posted this "question"(loosely employed here)?
You talk like a Catholic, justifying "The Magesterium"-they talk like you. Are you a Roman?
Is your interpretation a "human interpretation, or a "God interpretation?"
The word of God is perfect; human interpretation is not.
I slowed it down for you.
Your understanding is independent from objective truth. Truth goes on eternally, regardless of whether you believe it, or not, or whether you understand it.
To deny this, is to trust in human/carnal interpretation.
Its the imperfect receiver that's the problem. The word of God has always been perfect.
You are still yet to tell us what was scripturally lacking during the time that people spoke in tongues?
Deception,sophistry, as your "arguing" that my denying your interpretation, disagreeing with it, presupposes that yours is "God's interpretation/un-carnal interpretation."
You have the "God interpretation," do you candyandycain?
Common sense.
Paul doesn't talk about two distinctly different gospels, and he also complemented the Corinthians for not lacking in spiritual gifts as they waited for Christ's appearing.
We're still waiting for Christ's appearing, and so shouldn't be lacking in the gifts.
To deny this, is to trust in human/carnal interpretation.
Without the mind of Christ
being led by the Spirit
Having a supernatural Holy Spirit inspired understanding.
you only have carnal minded fleshly oriented understanding of scripture.
There is a big difference between comprehension and knowledge.
Comprehension is the supernatural act of experiencing Gods revelatory Love to His Children.
maturity is partnered with the foundations of the gospel with the comprehension of Gods love in action with the knowledge revealed and understood through and by the supernatural mind of Christ gives us a platform to be mature in loving action.
ephesians 3:16-19
16 that He would grant you, according to the riches of His glory, to be strengthened with power through His Spirit in the inner man, 17 so that Christ may dwell in your hearts through faith; and that you, being rooted and grounded in love, 18 may be able to comprehend with all the [a]saints what is the breadth and length and height and depth, 19 and to know the love of Christ which surpasses knowledge, that you may be filled up to all the fullness of God.
All of the above activity is supernatural empowerment by The Spirit encouraged through spiritual prayer. ( not asking amiss)
[/YELLOW]
poor andy
[/COLOR]
[/SIZE]
You just told us ! ! ! it was not lacking . . . . Then
[/YELLOW]
poor andy
Paul is talking about knowing that which is perfect. Knowing as we are known. If human interpretation interferes with knowing perfectly, then the word of God cannot be what Paul is talking about.
Your own reasoning proves you wrong, but you still won't accept it.