I don't.
You lie as usual.
LA
Too bad you're not as smart as you think you are. Your forte is
calling posters liars and making death predictions. Why not stick
with those? You excel at those.
I don't.
You lie as usual.
LA
Yes. It's clear that everything in the Bible is not written FOR me, or TO me. Actually, very little is written to any individual. Most everything is addressed to the group.Regular dispensationism? What does that mean? Do you mean to tell me that you acknowledge that not everything in the Bible is for you? Many things are for other people at other times. Is this what you believe?
Or are you going to tell me that you built a 300 cubit long ark for salvation?
I don't.
You lie as usual.
LA
Sure you do.
1 Cor 15:47 (KJV)
Explain it.
Only after His sending at His baptism by John--
The second man IS the Lord from heaven.
Why don't you believe it?
Because LAs brain is made up of a solid block of concrete.
He isn't the brightest bulb, but his main problem is an evil heart of unbelief.
No.
There are many others equally as ridiculous.
I do not think he knows Christ, like most madists.
LA
Hi and since you say I do not know Christ , HOW WERE YOU SAVED ??:chuckle::chuckle:
dan p
Wick Stick; You seem to have adopted the heresy that there are multiple gospels. Jarrod[/QUOTE said:Hi and where is there a verse that DISPENSATIONALISM is HERESY !!
TRY 1 COR 9:17 OR Eph 3:2 or Col 1:25 , are they HERESY ??
DAN P
There isn't... but that isn't what I said.Hi and where is there a verse that DISPENSATIONALISM is HERESY !!
TRY 1 COR 9:17 OR Eph 3:2 or Col 1:25 , are they HERESY ??
DAN P
The second man IS the Lord from heaven.
Why don't you believe it?
So then, what is the word of truth , the gospel of your salvation? If it's always been the same one piece of good news, why did Paul preach that his gospel was kept secret since the world began, but now (then) was made manifest? Why did God keep it a mystery? And where is it in the OT that a people like you and me could be saved?It is still about just one Way - no other name under heaven whereby we might be saved
There isn't... but that isn't what I said.
I'm not a Dispensationalist, but I used to be. Dispensationalism isn't about multiple gospels.
It is still about just one Way - no other name under heaven whereby we might be saved - but a difference in HOW different groups are drawn to the Living Christ. Classical Dispensationalism lays out 7 dispensations:
1 Innocence
2 Conscience
3 Human Government
4 Promise
5 Law
6 Grace
7 Divine Government
So, for example, in dispensation #2, people were drawn to Christ through Conscience. Conscience did not redeem them, though. Christ did.
Under the Law (#5), the exercise of the Law did not make the people righteous, but rather, the Law served to convict the sinner of his unrighteousness, which (again) leads them to Christ, who is the Redeemer.
Under grace (#6), it is the grace of God that pulls men towards Jesus. But it is still Jesus who saves.
There is but one gospel, and that is Christ crucified, risen and sitting at the right hand of Glory, interceding on behalf of mankind. The only thing that changes is how man finds Him.
This movement here at TOL and elsewhere that says there are multiple gospels - that isn't Dispensationalism. That's not even Mid-Acts Dispensationalism (which draws the line between #5 Law and #6 Grace a bit later than Classical Dispensationalism).
Those who preach such a thing are carrying the idea of dispensations to an extreme. You should come up with another name for your doctrine. 2-gospel dispensationalism, or 3, or 7, or whatever. Maybe just call yourself Paulians. I don't think you're Christians anymore, since you've stuck Christ and His teachings in a bucket that you say doesn't apply to yourself.
Jarrod
I'm not a Dispensationalist, but I used to be.
Are you claiming the man Jesus came from Heaven, as if He was already a man in Heaven.
or is it not the truth that the man came from man and God came from Heaven to make Him the Man He is and sent Him into the world from His baptism onward.
Was not John sent from Heaven?
LA
There isn't... but that isn't what I said.
I'm not a Dispensationalist, but I used to be. Dispensationalism isn't about multiple gospels.
he's mixed up like the rest of themHi , so what are you NOW ??
dan p