I agree.
Haaretz is a pro-Jewish site. It would be inclined to protect Jewish belief, not dispute it.
I agree.
Haaretz is a pro-Jewish site. It would be inclined to protect Jewish belief, not dispute it. The fact that they say that Exodus has no supporting evidence is akin to a Christian site saying that Jesus never existed. That's a big statement.
Angel4Truth's pro-Christian source also admits to there being no tangible evidence for Exodus, as you can see
And if Mohammed were to appear in the same region today, he would be among those who speak the same language, sing the same songs, and have the same holy book.Have you applied a scientific approach to this claim?:
If King David went to Jerusalem today he would be among those who speak the same language, sing the same songs and have the same holy book.
If Confucius were to appear in tinmen square today - different language and religion.
I don't know why the only two choices for protection are God and the devil. Sikhs are a small religious population, like Jews. Who protected them?Factually, Israel ceased as a nation with a homeland for 2000 years, re entered their land still intact after virtually every continent and nation either expelled them or tried to exterminate them.
Either the devil keeps them alive or it is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob who has authenticated His very existence by keeping covenant with the Jews despite their rejection of the Jewish Messiah.
The one thing that Isis, alqueda and every Arab agrees to is their hatred of the Jews and their desire to eliminate the Jewish race. According to the God of the bible they are cursing themselves.
And what passages predicted these exact things?And brother greg, scientifically smoke this, the bible predicted two world wide regatherings of the Jews to their land the first fulfilled in 1948, the second still future as they will again flee the land from the antichrist but first a third Jewish Temple Will be up and functioning right where the Muslim Dome of the Rock sits.
No it doesnt, you claimed you couldnt read it past the first page, so how you claim what it says? You are dishonest.
You are uninformed. It is a far-left paper in Israel, and not by a long shot a supporter of traditional Jewish beliefs.
You are one misled individual. You really are a Muslim apologist.
And if Mohammed were to appear in the same region today, he would be among those who speak the same language, sing the same songs, and have the same holy book.
I don't know why the only two choices for protection are God and the devil. Sikhs are a small religious population, like Jews. Who protected them?
And yes of course Muslim terrorist organizations want to destroy Israel. Many of the governments over there do as well. That's not excusable and it's something we have to watch. But for Middle East nations surrounding Israel, they're still bitter about having their land grabbed from them and being used to make modern Israel. That doesn't excuse violence for either side, but it tells you why they hate Israel so much
And what passages predicted these exact things?
If Mohamed came back he would find tremendous differences within his cult.
Mohamhead lived in the 6th century A.D.
When did David live? circa 600BC
How about Moses? 1200 BC
THE MUSLIMS ARE MADE UP OF ARABS PERSIANS RUSSIANS TURKS
JEWS ARE NOT A RELIGION BUT A RACE AND A NATION
THAT IS THE DIFFERENCE
MOHAMHEAD HAS NO EXISTENCE PRIOR TO THE SEVENTH CENTURY A D
DAVID'S NATIONALITY DATES BACK TO ABRAHAM AND ABRAHAM HAD THE SAME RELIGION DAVID DID
NO ISLAMIC PEOPLE HAVE EXPERIENCED TWO THOUSAND YEARS OF SUFFERING AT THE HANDS OF THEIR NEIGHBORS AS THE JEWS HAVE
YOUR ANSWER IS WILLFULLY IGNORANT
I didn't realize that saying "Muslims killing isn't justified" was what Muslim apologists do. My bad