Your right. If we see a need, we
should help our neighbor. More on that in a bit.
What, did God change between the Old and New Testaments? Was God really mean in the Old testament, but then in the intertestament period He went to counseling and then in the New Testament He's nice? I tell you NO!
God does not change in His righteousness, in His justness, His goodness. He requires punishment for crimes here on this earth, and punishment for sins in the hereafter.
Did Elijah do good to the 450 prophets of Baal? No, he slaughtered them. And yet God brought Him directly into heaven. Elijah must have done something right.
Now, obviously Elijah was under God's authority as a prophet, and if someone were to do such a thing today, it would be justice to try and execute them for murder.
No, he did not teach the opposite of the law. God is not arbitrary when it comes to moral law. He cannot bless those who murder because it would go against His nature.
One of the mistakes you keep making is that Jesus did not repeal the law or teach the opposite of it. He taught an extension of the law. For example, Matthew 5:21-22, Jesus said that if someone is even angry with someone without cause is in danger of judgment. Nowhere in that verse did Jesus repeal the law against murder. He only extrapolated it to the individual.
“You have heard that it was said to those of old, ‘You shall not murder, and whoever murders will be in danger of the judgment.’ *But I say to you that whoever is angry with his brother without a cause shall be in danger of the judgment. And whoever says to his brother, ‘Raca!’ shall be in danger of the council. But whoever says, ‘You fool!’ shall be in danger of hell fire. - Matthew 5:21-22
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew5:21-22&version=NKJV
The Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 5-7) does not lay down rules for a government but principles for an upright heart.
In fact, in that very sermon, jesus made the distiction between individuals and government. (Matthew 5:25-26).
Jesus did not command the authorities to turn the other cheek or to void the law. God wants the governing authorities to uphold the law, showing no mercy to criminals (Hebrews 10:28, Romans 13:3-4).
You're right. But again, he did not repeal anything in that passage. Only taught an extension.
*“You have heard that it was said, ‘You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy.’ *But I say to you, love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you, and pray for those who spitefully use you and persecute you, *that you may be sons of your Father in heaven; for He makes His sun rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain on the just and on the unjust. *For if you love those who love you, what reward have you? Do not even the tax collectors do the same? *And if you greet your brethren only, what do you do more than others? Do not even the tax collectors do so? *Therefore you shall be perfect, just as your Father in heaven is perfect. - Matthew 5:43-48
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew5:43-48&version=NKJV
Marhig, is it possible to love and hate at the same time? I say it is, and that God does. He hates the sinner for being a sinner, for being unrighteous. But He also loves them enough to want them to come to Him in repentance.
This is what Jesus was saying in the passage above. He still wants us to hate our enemies for being unrighteous, but also to love them so that they come to repent. More on this in a bit.
Prison should not be used as a form of punishment, because a life sentence cannot be executed quickly.
The only three forms of punishment authorized by God in the Bible (because they can be executed swiftly) are restitution, corporal punishment (such as flogging), and the death penalty. Prison is only for holding a criminal until he can be tried and convicted.
*Because the sentence against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the heart of the sons of men is fully set in them to do evil. - Ecclesiastes 8:11
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecclesiastes8:11&version=NKJV
If Jesus repealed the law in Matthew 5:38-39, it would directly contradict what he said just 20 verses earlier:
*“Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. *For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. *Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. - Matthew 5:17-19
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Matthew5:17-19&version=NKJV
Do you think Jesus contradicted Himself?
I use the Law (and rightly so, even though I am a Christian) to show people that they cannot get to heaven by their actions, nor will God let them into heaven with what they've done already. I also use the Law to show what God is like, that he is good and just and righteous.
Except you can't make that argument from the Bible, because otherwise you would be arguing that God told His people to do wrong, and the Bible says do not do evil that Good may come of it. So if it is wrong to kill, let alone murder, God would be contradicting himself when he says that.
Jesus didn't, but He told His apostles to go out and buy weapons.
*Then He said to them, “But now, he who has a money bag, let him take it, and likewise a knapsack; and he who has no sword, let him sell his garment and buy one. - Luke 22:36
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke22:36&version=NKJV
Again, Jesus did not come to destroy the Law, but to fulfill it. He did not repeal the laws concerning executing criminals.
You're forgetting one key fact: at the time of Jesus' ministry, Israel was occupied by the Roman Empire, who, when they took over, took away the Jews' authority to punish criminals.
Had Jesus said anything other than what He did, he could have been taken to the cross prematurely. The pharisees were trying to trick Jesus into breaking the law of the land.
Actually, the word used in that verse means extortion. Don't extort people, be satisfied with your wages.
"Soldiers were also kai questioning eper?ta? · de him autos, saying leg?, “ And kai we h?meis, what tis should we do poie??” · kai He said leg? to them autos, “ Do not m?deis extort diasei? money from anyone, or m?de accuse sykophante? them falsely ; and kai be content arke? with · ho your hymeis wages ops?nion.” " - Luke 3:14
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke3:14&version=MOUNCE
This is the only time in the New Testament that this word "diasei?" is used.
The sermon on the mount was to show how the individual with an upright heart should act. it does not lay down rules for a government.
Talking to Christians about spiritual battles. Would you use something physical to fight something that is not?
"Those born of God"
You seem to forget that not everyone is a Christian or Jew. You forget that because of that fact, there will always be wars and unrest until Christ's returns to reign on the earth.
As I implied above, anything in scripture that tells us to be loving is for an upright heart.
Replied to this argument above.
No one here has said that we should start killing for no reason. That is murder.
However, killing a convicted murderer, rapist, adulterer, etc, is not murder, and indeed is perfectly acceptable, and in fact meets the needs of justice. The government is the only entity that has the authority to do so. However, they can delegate the actual responsibility to carry out the execution of justice to whomever they choose.
Can we get back to building my point now? Perhaps we can refer back to this post while we do.
So Marhig:
You answered yes. You are correct.
You answered yes. You are correct.
Now, my third question.
What is the most successful way of bringing someone to repentance according to the Bible?
(Sorry for the long post)
Sent from my Pixel XL using
TheologyOnline mobile app