Nope. God doesn't commit sin, neither does He endorse those who commit sin. Yes, that we are to lay down our lives to fight for the liberties and rights of our selves, neighbors and even those of our enemies; since ignorance and pacifism erode both, daily.As should everyone.If it threatens people's liberties or rights: yes.Your reasoning is flawed by the simple fact that those you've grouped as being did-obedient are on God's side. Jesus said that those who aren't against Him are for Him. For example: those in the Democratic party (for the most part) are against God while most Republicans don't oppose Him at all.Everyone was, when Jesus told us to judge righteously.Right smack-dab in the middle of the controversy that God designed to bring such arguments up so that we'd be aware of them and do something about them.
Wow, God, Guns, and Marines, Huzzah, Go Republicans. Kill in the name of the Jesus. Is that the size of it?
So let me distill your clarifications as I understand them:
1. You ARE ready to take up arms to oppose tyranny in any form,
2. but God has
not ordained those tyrannical governments (your correction noted here, "God does not endorse those who commit sin")
3. Rulers that do not obey God need to be curbed with force if need be, by Christians (because they threaten rights and liberties)
4. All Christians have been ordained by God to overthrow governments, if they judge that they should do so (there is no need for a declaration of war from a Pope or bishop or for a sign from heaven)
5. You are privileged to take human life as you deem necessary in engagement of these methods.
Did I get all of those right? I merged the original statement I had made with your corrections.
So let me jump ahead one more step with a question based on those:
Romans 13:1-2 KJV
(1) Let every soul be subject unto the higher powers.
For there is no power but of God: the powers that be are ordained of God.
(2) Whosoever therefore resisteth the power, resisteth the ordinance of God: and they that resist shall receive to themselves damnation.
Are not tyrannical governments considered "
powers that be?" For example, the Roman government was certainly tyrannical and not Godly at all. They burnt Christians as candles and fed them to lions. Yet Paul speaks of the powers that be are ordained of God to the Romans of the Roman empire of which he himself is a Roman citizen.
Why does he not say that the Christians are ordained of Christ to overthrow the government tyranny that threatens people's lives and liberties?
Jesus didn't come to bring peace but a sword. He wants the fire that will cleanse this earth to be lit. You're lukewarm. You're one of the ones that He's going to spit out.Yup, but ONLY when necessary. Do you think that Hitler should have been allowed to become earth's first king?
* So that bit that Jesus said on the sermon on the mount, "the meek shall inherit the earth..." he really meant "the warriors shall inherit the earth?" I somehow missed the part where he told us to take up literal swords to kill people on the earth. I thought I saw him say the opposite. Can you point that out to me?
* Do you think that God needs his little flock to pick up arms to direct the powers and governments of the world (such as Caesar, Hitler, Stalin, Mao) as he wills?
* Is God is powerless to direct legions of angels at his command or to even command them to be consumed of worms if that was what he wanted?
* If Hitler became world king for a generation, does that stop the gospel of God and prevent his return as King of Kings in his time?