glorydaz
Well-known member
You're simply one petty individual.
Just as you are the typical hack - confusing your own misguided notions as "the Spirit's leading."
:chuckle:
You're simply one petty individual.
Just as you are the typical hack - confusing your own misguided notions as "the Spirit's leading."
Don't believe her smile, DP, I once did; and just look at her snarl now.
:rotfl:
Poor Danoh, he was taken advantage of by a woman's smile. :nono:
Get yourself a clue already - borrow one of GD's - hers are "spirit led" (indigestion) :chuckle:
Whip Appeal?
:chuckle:
Rom. 5:6-8.
No.
Paul is UNIQUELY applying the finished work of that Prophesied Cross to people THIS SIDE of The Mystery hid in God.
He ALONE is a SEEMING oddball in this, in Scripture.
Towards what end?
Towards God's Mystery in "our glory" in His Son's Mystery Glory.
This is NOT OT ground.
The principle is the same; the application differs.
Does Israel end up in the Body just because Christ originally died for THEIR sins according to THEIR Scriptures?
Do OT saints end up in the Body, just because God applied the merits of THEIR Prophesied Cross to them, in His forebearance?
These are actual, consistent Acts 9 Position types of questions.
Your assertions reveal you have not asked those kinds of questions in some areas.
Jerry certainly does not; RD and Musti and Steko appear to have asked them in some areas you have not; and so on.
This is strictly a neutral observation on my part.
Only an as much as possible neutral observation allows seeing what is what; where each individual is actually coming from, and so on.
Where I find I myself have mis-fired on that in misreading something or even having misread a post by someone, is where I also at have at times ended up off in APPROACH.
What does one learn DURING the BASICS of Math?
"Now run the math backwards on itself; see if it still adds up."
The brightest within Acts 9 do just that - ask any of them.
Take that time you have off and go to some of their various conferences.
You'll find none of them lay things out to others the way you and some of your pals often do.
That is an APPROACH issue.
But for his insolence, RD's posts more often come closest on here to their approach.
You might want to go back and study out Stam's overall APPROACH in his still one heck of a great work - to - this - very - day - "Things That Differ."
Speaking of mystery...
This process - of identifying the right study principles is not only never over, but is often born anew or from above, right on the spot EACH TIME, as one interacts with the Word, and He interacts with one in return - through - His - Word - in - you - that - believe - His - Word.
2 Corinthians 3:18 But we all, with open face beholding as in a glass the glory of the Lord, are changed into the same image from glory to glory, even as by the Spirit of the LORD.
I was talking about APPROACH - NOT about some "owner's manual" about WHAT to believe.
That would be Jerry's "what Sir Robert Anderson declared is the final say" or DanP's exact same, equally written in long dried over cement department: Robert Brock.
Though Brock left Anderson way, way, way back in the dust of Anderson's own, crystal clear obvious Acts 28 APPROACH tendencies.
I was talking about consistency in an Acts 9 APPROACH, not about Broccoli :chuckle:
THERE is where the rubber meets the road - right in between the results each our APPROACH either ends us up on a same page on one thing or another, or not.
Rom. 14:5.
Nasty innuendos suit you well.
I don't know about your faith but you sure write like college professor, imo.
You make people's heads spin.
You think that made your head spin, mine spun right off, long ago :chuckle:
Rom. 5:6-8.
Leave it to you to turn a ribbing into something else even as you rationalize your support of the Admiited Sexual Predator "Sex in common with my daughter, Ivanka" Donald Trump.
You're dissimulation must be "spirit led" I'm sure. :chuckle:
I don't know about your faith but you sure write like college professor, imo.
You make people's heads spin.
You mock?
I'm not surprised you scoff at being Spirit led, Danoh. You've already admitted you rely totally on your own understanding and "approaches". :idunno:
Romans 8:14 For as many as are led by the Spirit of God, they are the sons of God.
Your mind does run in the gutter. No doubt about it.
Why is it the natural man of the flesh has such an active imagination? I know.... His mind just runs in the gutter, and it is stuck there until he is saved. Get saved, Danoh.
Can I borrow your hat?
:chuckle:
There you go again, violating the most basic of Mid-Acts study principles.
And your own say nothing to you - what real pals.
Personally, I'd rather know where I stand, doctrinally.
Nothing like a good challenge as to where I might be off.
What an absolutely life-less so called MAD you and your pals hold to.
And you, you actually believe the Spirit is the One leading you to spit on anyone who does not agree with your errors?
You remain amusing. Tragically so.
Never mind what that passage was actually talking about.
Not to mention that you are NOT even manifesting its fruit in any way, shape or form other than in your own self-delusion and that of your obviously equally self-serving pals.
Rom. 5:6-8 is all one can focus on, when dealing with or lining over at your kind.
Joyously so. :thumb:
For that much, I thank your ever unwitting contribution :chuckle:
So says you the hypocrite - you, the rabid supporter of Admitted Sexual Predator Donald Trump.
Rom. 5:6-8.
The fruit inspector is gonna catch you.
Full of graceYeah, the hack does tend to be turned off by anyone pointing out the obvious to him or her :chuckle:
Ya got me there. I am guilty of turning your kind off.
And if anything, I am often as clueless on some things as any one else.
But you take what you read into another's words as being where they were coming from.
You're simply one petty individual.
Just as you are the typical hack - confusing your own misguided notions as "the Spirit's leading."
Funny how the only time your kind post to me is when you smell out the possibility to go all conflict with me - you can't even begin to imagine how much that cracks me up.
If I were smarter I could just start thread after thread after thread picking on you fools just to keep my own threads not only really busy, but that I might sell tickets to this side show you so called "grace gospelers" ever prove to one and all but your own, you so live for.
In short, welcome to my thread, GD :chuckle:
So what's it gonna be, you gonna continue to prove right my point about your ever obvious need for conflict, or are you going to move on from this thread and prove me wrong by that, only to prove me right by your going off to dance your little dance with some other fool on some other thread?
Come on, admit it already - you just love this Musti - JohnW like smack down nonsense - you know you miss when I was one of your live for conflict, smack down pals :chuckle:
Rom. 5:6-8.
Better that than your Groper in Chief :chuckle:
And either deal with the Acts 9 / Acts 28 issues STP and DanP and I were going back and forth about, or move on.
Rom. 5:6-8.