Noah’s Ark Found!

WatchmanOnTheWall

Well-known member
Look closer. It wasn't the Word being ridiculed. Just you.

No they were ridiculing the Word of God because the Word of God confirms this boat shaped object is exactly the same size as Noah's Ark made from petrified wood and pitch with internal metal fixing laid out along keel and bulk head lines and with the remains of animal parts and excrement inside. Plus it's lying in the mountains of Ararat exactly where the Bible says it came to rest.

It matches God's Word perfectly.
 

beameup

New member
This is Fort Rock in Eastern Oregon. It must be the remains of Noah's Ark.
FortRock.jpg


oregon-fort-rock-sunset02.jpg
 

Wick Stick

Well-known member
No they were ridiculing the Word of God because the Word of God confirms this boat shaped object is exactly the same size as Noah's Ark made from petrified wood and pitch with internal metal fixing laid out along keel and bulk head lines and with the remains of animal parts and excrement inside. Plus it's lying in the mountains of Ararat exactly where the Bible says it came to rest.

It matches God's Word perfectly.
I'm sure it does. The Turks who constructed it there probably followed the plan in the Bible.

Follow the money...
 

oatmeal

Well-known member
Noah’s Ark Found! Google map location: 39.440688,44.234844
(Left click and highlight map coordinates to see location on Google maps)

This film explains why it is Noah's Ark:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iCyOVGBnNp8

:rain:
:turkey::turkey:
:cow::cow:
:sheep::sheep:
:dog::dog:
:bowser::bowser:
:DK::DK:

If there were remains of a ship that could be truly proven from Biblical evidence to be Noah's ark, that would be cool

However, , God's word is true regardless.

The shroud of Turin does not fit the Biblical record, it is falsely claimed to be a shroud that covered the face of the corpse of Jesus
 

iouae

Well-known member
"Iron fittings" aren't mentioned in the Biblical description . Possibly because iron started being used only 2,000 years later...

Iron is mentioned as being present pre-flood.

Gen 4:22
And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naaman.

Iron took off soon after the flood in Sumer.

Maybe iron artifacts rusted in the flood.
 

WatchmanOnTheWall

Well-known member
I'm sure it does. The Turks who constructed it there probably followed the plan in the Bible.

Follow the money...

Wrong.

It was recording as being there in middle ages. No one can fake what is there due to it's age; over 4000 year old petrified materials and metallurgy that wasn't known till the modern era. You must research things first before commenting as it shows you are someone who posts with out caring about the facts.
 

WatchmanOnTheWall

Well-known member
If there were remains of a ship that could be truly proven from Biblical evidence to be Noah's ark, that would be cool
You only have to watch it to see the proof.
However, , God's word is true regardless.
Amen.
The shroud of Turin does not fit the Biblical record, it is falsely claimed to be a shroud that covered the face of the corpse of Jesus

http://theologyonline.com/showthrea...he-Turin-Shroud-is-real&p=5153901#post5153901
 

Jose Fly

New member
I'm sure it does. The Turks who constructed it there probably followed the plan in the Bible.

Follow the money...
The whole "we found the ark" thing has been a cottage industry for decades, and as this thread shows the folks perpetrating it will never lack for gullible buyers.
 

The Barbarian

BANNED
Banned
From the air it looks like a syncline from an eroded top.

But people love to fool themselves. It's another "Jesus on a tortilla" game.
 

iouae

Well-known member
They drilled a core sample into the ark and found animal dung, cat hair, and fossilised antlers. Then there are the metal rivets etc...

I really love Ron Wyatt and what he has found, including the sea crossing of the Israelites, Mt Sinai in Arabia, Sodom with sulphur balls etc. He even claims to have found Jesus blood with 24 chromosomes in the crack of rock below where Christ was crucified. I challenge folks to at least watch the video and challenge the science.
 

chair

Well-known member
Iron is mentioned as being present pre-flood.

Gen 4:22
And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naaman.

Iron took off soon after the flood in Sumer.

Maybe iron artifacts rusted in the flood.

You are right- I missed that. Elsewhere in the Bible it appears that iron started much later- for example, The Philistines had iron, but prevented the Israelites from having it. Archaeologically speaking, the Iron Age was long after the Biblical time of Noah.
 

WatchmanOnTheWall

Well-known member
The whole "we found the ark" thing has been a cottage industry for decades, and as this thread shows the folks perpetrating it will never lack for gullible buyers.

If you checked your facts you would know this artefact was shown to have been visited by pilgrims during the middle ages and was recognised as Noah's Ark at that time too.
 
Last edited:

WatchmanOnTheWall

Well-known member
You are right- I missed that. Elsewhere in the Bible it appears that iron started much later- for example, The Philistines had iron, but prevented the Israelites from having it. Archaeologically speaking, the Iron Age was long after the Biblical time of Noah.



Enoch
CHAPTER VIII.
1. And Azâzêl taught men to make swords, and knives, and shields, and breastplates, and made known to them the metals 〈of the earth〉 and the art of working them, and bracelets, and ornaments,

http://www.sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/boe011.htm
 
Top