Don't worry Bronco nation all is good we signed Mark Sanchez. :doh: :rotfl:
Well, his career stats are marginally better than Peyton's were last year...so...but really, his last two years with a decent team weren't half bad. His rating through nine games in 2014 was excellent. He's at least a solid back up.Don't worry Bronco nation all is good we signed Mark Sanchez. :doh: :rotfl:
We are all hoping that's the plan.He's at least a solid back up.
Now Kelly merited the "greatest regular season quarterback" description. Heck, his back up had the best game in a Bills uniform in the post season. lain:Sanchez 27.0 / NA
Like Jim Kelly. He was awesome.
2. Favre, Montana, Bradshaw and Aikman, Warner, Brees and Starr actually played better in the post season than the regular season.
Bradshaw was simply a home run hitter who found his shot in the biggest game. I like him in the Hall for that, but I don't put him in the best of discussion for the same reason.One of these is not like the others in his regular season, which is the vast majority of the career. His interception % is an incredibly bad 5.4. His rating is below mediocre journeymen, then jumps 13 points in the playoffs.
Bradshaw was simply a home run hitter who found his shot in the biggest game. I like him in the Hall for that, but I don't put him in the best of discussion for the same reason.
I can visualize attempts between picks very easily, and probably because I've been a fan with both Parcels and Belichick as head coaches over the past 20 years or so, I've come to see turnovers as of particular importance. If a QB goes many more attempts between picks than others, then that is more than a QB---that guy has half a spot on defense too, because we usually attribute turnover ratios to the defense when the offensive turnovers are within average range. It's not correct to say so, it's more a feeling, and a reflection of policy, but when a QB is head and shoulders above the competition in the number of pass attempts that he can log without throwing a pick, it's the opposite of diminishing returns. Every play more that a QB can go is even more important than the last.A better metric is QB efficiency rating which includes that very important one you listed. That was used exclusively until recently because of the rule changes. It measures everything per pass attempt, not completion. The rules change brought about looking at it a little different with Total QBR. The measurement no longer looks at going 5 of 7 passing for the game as being productive. Where as 20 of 28 is productive, but not more efficient. I like using both standards.
OTs score the highest on the test among NFLers, if Wiki is to be trusted today, followed by centers, and then QBs.I wonder if he is no better than Jeff George but is a statistical anomaly. Jeff George is said to have killed the Wonderlic test with a 10. lain:
I also wonder if this test is like the military ASVAB, and certain people that process info a certain way just can't do it. Marino, according to the chart I just looked at scored a 15 and Bradshaw scored a 16. We do know that plenty of terrible QBs have high scores. Colin Capernick comes to mind. I read on my CBS sports feed the Browns are talking to him. And apparently Al Davis's team is making much better choices without him.
To put it in perspective, a score of 21 is roughly indicative of an average IQ, at 100. A 29 is roughly 115. A 36 would be about 132.I wonder if he is no better than Jeff George but is a statistical anomaly. Jeff George is said to have killed the Wonderlic test with a 10. lain:
I also wonder if this test is like the military ASVAB, and certain people that process info a certain way just can't do it. Marino, according to the chart I just looked at scored a 15 and Bradshaw scored a 16. We do know that plenty of terrible QBs have high scores. Colin Capernick comes to mind. I read on my CBS sports feed the Browns are talking to him. And apparently Al Davis's team is making much better choices without him.