You should definitely think about getting yourself a trophy...one of those participation ones with the generic, vaguely athletic topper.I achieved a life-long dream of going 5-9 against the spread last week
Interestingly enough, I believe that's the subtext for nearly every republicanchick post. :shocked:So here is what the script spat out:
Flip a coin the last two years the games haven't been close, but they've been evenly divided...this year, the way the Pats are playing I'm going with New England. So suck it, Guesstamatron 2000 or whatever... :idunno:Now, I give you Cal's week 8 Picks:
Mia @ NE(-7.5): The all-knowing Python script believes that like their perennially lackluster brethren in New Jersey, Miami will keep this one close enough. Dolphins.
:rotfl: Guess.Det @ KC(-5.5): I'm not sure which way I would have gone on this one if I was deciding with reasons and stuff, but I'm not, so Lions.
If Ben plays I'm with you. If he doesn't I'm agin' ya.Cin @ Pit(+2.5): Fate has chosen the first of an alarmingly small number of home teams, and already I'm starting to doubt the sanity of this plan. Steelers.
I believe it's the Boutineers. And there's no way I'm going with that arrangement. Atlanta.TB @ Atl(-7.5): You don't get to see spreads like this that often in this division. I'm strangely comfortable going with whatever Tampa Bay's team is called.
I have NO by a point...so that's too rich a spread. Come on Eli. Giants.NYG @ NO(-3.5): Is it just me, or did someone at CBS accidentally put a minus sign in there? Giants.
There's a fine line between being a Bears fan and full blown narcolepsy. I'll take Minnesota.Min @ Chi(+2.5): I might start a Cal's Sleeper of the Week pick, meaning I'll point out which game looks like it would be my favorite to nap through. Our inaugural contest? This one. Vikings.
Stop it or you'll jinx the whole shebang. Arizona.Ari @ Cle(+5.5): My idiotic script idea doesn't look so dumb now, does it? Cardinals.
It's hard to go against science. And we don't do anything easy in my family. Even put the nails in backward. Baltimore. EDIT (10/28) Then again, SD's offense has been fairly potent and Baltimore is nearly dead last against the pass...okay, I'm flipping this one. Chargers.SD @ Bal(-3.5): This game must have been hard to handicap. Would I rely on either of these teams to beat anyone by more than a field goal after what they've done the first seven weeks? No. But thankfully, a complex mathematical algorithm imported into a very uncomplex program is making the decision for me. Chargers.
I hate the line, but I hate the Niners more. Rams.SF @ StL(-8.5): What is wrong with you, Cal? Even you wouldn't be dumb enough to—49ers.
Like I said, Ten made Atlanta look like a gifted soccer team and Houston managed to make Miami look like the Rams when they had an offense. Titans.Ten @ Hou(-.5 <-- :rotfl: ): Now that is a spread. A low-cholesterol spread whose resemblance to butter strains credulity. Texans.
Jet fans don't cry? Bye week baby? Talk like a fan? Oh why not...Jets.NYJ @ Oak(+6.5): I think my script has a thing for Jersey boys. Jets.
That's a big line. Seattle should win this one, but I can't forget that they got past the Lions by a fg. Dallas.Sea @ Dal(+6.5): The Cowboys fan is native to Texas, but can be found in the wild in every environment and climate of North America. They are known for their keen memory of the nineties and for eating their young. Seahawks.
The money is all over GB and 3. At 3.5 I'm staying with Denver at home.GB @ Den(+3.5): I've come this far. No turning back now. *closes eyes and clicks his mouse on*: Broncos.
Six and a half? Pshaw. Give me Indy...and another bourbon.Ind @ Car(-6.5): This weeks picks contest will most likely be wrapped up on Sunday night again, because nobody in our pool is picking Indy, not even the soulless, dispassionate script. Panthers.
Last edited: