That or he's got some real rotten luck.
Or he just flat out chokes in the postseason.
That or he's got some real rotten luck.
One of the things Peyton haters love to chant is one and dones. But look at those.
Peyton Manning has NINE one-and-dones. Why did you only list six?
2005 (which you left out) was probably his biggest choke ever. Peyton and the Colts were heavy favorites against the Steelers, but Peyton played horribly, and the #1 seed Colts lost.
Think of Dan with an all time cast. Standing behind that Cowboy's line that protected Aikman, handing off to Barry Sanders, throwing to Jerry Rice...
Pay attention. I included it, though it's under 06 because that's when it was actually played. I left off the last game because while I think he blew it, he blew it due to injury and that's another horse.Peyton Manning has NINE one-and-dones. Why did you only list six?
2005 (which you left out) was probably his biggest choke ever. Peyton and the Colts were heavy favorites against the Steelers, but Peyton played horribly, and the #1 seed Colts lost.
Who else do you want him throwing to during his heyday?
There goes myopic tet, scrambling to make a contrary point. I don't care what he did in college, though many a number one has been number two (either) by the final gun. As a pro I saw him take teams that were dreadful and win with them, take one of those to a SB. I'm not sure anyone else would have.Marino, like Peyton Manning, had a tendency to choke in big games.
That's because you don't want to get into how well your team did without Brady and how poorly mine did without Manning. It hurts your guy.I also don't buy into this "if he only had better teams" nonsense.
See, that's moving goal posts. I didn't say he had bad wrs. I said he had bad teams. I've set out prior games where his defenses have completely let him down. The Colt's problem was always that it had stars at a few skill positions and lesser players around them, along with mostly okay coaching. Dungy was the only really good defensive coach and he made the most out of the talent to take pressure off of Peyton.Who else do you want him throwing to during his heyday?
I think that plays in, but teams matter, which is why Barry Sanders never made it to the dance, along with a lot of extraordinary players at every position. A great qb can do what no other skill position player can in terms of impact, but as Elway and Marino can attest, they won't win much that matters without it.With Peyton I really do believe it's a combination of bad luck, timing, and a tendency to just try to be too smart for his own good.
I think I can. That is, I think every qb who steps on the field is nervous. It's what you do with it. That's just the reality of competition in any endeavor. I got butterflies before a bench trial, but I chose to think of it the way you do that rise on the roller coaster, instead of a rush toward a fire.It happens. Diminishes nothing in terms of his greatness, but you can't tell me his nerves haven't gotten the better of him at least a couple times.
This includes over 30 dropped passes in what equates to half a regular season.
I don't care what he did in college,
That's because you don't want to get into how well your team did without Brady and how poorly mine did without Manning. It hurts your guy.
See, that's moving goal posts. I didn't say he had bad wrs. I said he had bad teams.
I think that plays in, but teams matter, which is why Barry Sanders never made it to the dance, along with a lot of extraordinary players at every position.
I think I can. That is, I think every qb who steps on the field is nervous. It's what you do with it. That's just the reality of competition in any endeavor. I got butterflies before a bench trial, but I chose to think of it the way you do that rise on the roller coaster, instead of a rush toward a fire.
I didn't watch his college and given your way of seeing some of what we've looked at I can't credit you on the point, but I did see him in the pros and so yeah, I can say that with a great deal of comfort.In college, Marino was surrounded by the best talent in the country, but still choked in big games.
Yet, somehow you think that if Marino was surrounded by the best talent in the NFL, he wouldn't choke in big games.
Doesn't surprise me at all.That doesn't make much sense to me.
I think the system and coaching works wonderfully. It doesn't impact the anomaly because it occurs even within the metric of that closed system.Or looking at it another way, it may burst the bubble of your pet "anomaly" and explain why Pats players don't excel on other teams: Because the system there works. But I digress.
Man, that would be damning if it remotely resembled what I did say. Thank goodness it didn't. An inconsistent kicker who cost them some important games (included in a look the numbers in my last) no real running game to speak of for most of his career. So an essentially one dimensional offense with a defense that consisted of a similar three or four stars surrounded by a want of depth and support.Oh, I see; so aside from Peyton, his receivers, his coach, his tight ends, his running back, and a pretty decent kicker, that leaves...whoa, what a shock! That's everybody but Peyton and the offense.:chuckle:
And his picks (everyone throws them, just saying) were rarely the thing that sent his teams home, which is why his post season numbers look better than Brady's even with that injury disaster game factored in.But last I heard defenses don't throw picks. Ya know. Just saying.
Can you imagine him on that Cowboys team Emmitt had? Man...Poor loyal Barry.:sad:
I think that averages are built against average and I do think he has a tendency to try too hard, a habit built on the weaknesses of those earlier teams. And that can and has hurt him on occasion. I don't think he chokes, I think sometimes he takes on more than he can. It's a quiet Favre streak that's masked by the cerebral nature of his play, but it's something a better coach would have rooted. Ah, well...You think he hangs it up?
I think the system and coaching works wonderfully. It doesn't impact the anomaly because it occurs even within the metric of that closed system.
Thank goodness it didn't. An inconsistent kicker who cost them some important games (included in a look the numbers in my last) no real running game to speak of for most of his career. So an essentially one dimensional offense with a defense that consisted of a similar three or four stars surrounded by a want of depth and support.
And his picks (everyone throws them, just saying) were rarely the thing that sent his teams home, which is why his post season numbers look better than Brady's even with that injury disaster game factored in.
The off year establishes the difference between Brady's team and Peyton's. And, again, Brady inherited not only a much better coach but a much better team right from the start. It doesn't diminish Tom, but it contextualizes the oft errant mythology surrounding the two, one the numbers won't support.
Can you imagine him on that Cowboys team Emmitt had? Man...
I think that averages are built against average and I do think he has a tendency to try too hard, a habit built on the weaknesses of those earlier teams. And that can and has hurt him on occasion. I don't think he chokes, I think sometimes he takes on more than he can. It's a quiet Favre streak that's masked by the cerebral nature of his play, but it's something a better coach would have rooted. Ah, well...
Not without Peyton. Without Peyton they won how many? Two. They won two games after going double digit wins since 2003.A squad that still managed to get into the postseason year in year out and racked up double digital wins like clockwork.
As long as Peyton was at the helm, which is my point. Without him they looked like a team that had to jettison coaches and players and rebuild what was mostly a weak team held together by a once in a blue moon quarterback, which is what then happened.If they kept stumbling in at 9-7 or earning a berth due to tiebreakers, it'd be one thing. They dominated in the regular season year in year out.
I think playing half your games without the influence of awful weather and then running into it in the playoffs couldn't help, but Peyton wasn't really a bad poor weather qb. You have to dip into the extremes of cold to impact him and then, as with most, sure.At this point I might start wondering if eight games in a dome and a soft division had something to do with it.
And I think those were almost always on the heels of a defensive or special teams lapse and played to that internal sense that he'd have to do it in spite of, which was truer than most realized until the injury year and the exposure that followed.Rarely, true...though he always managed to find one hell of a time to throw one or two.:chuckle:
It's a shame people can't settle for greatness and just appreciate it for what it is.With you on the myth.:cheers:
I think the same was true for Elway until he found the right team late and a coach who could force him into a system. I don't know if there's time for it or if Kubiak is the man to do it or if Peyton's wheels are starting to come off an it's like Marino's leg, but I hope Manning heals up and gives it a shot.As opposed to choking, he bites off more than he can chew. Okay. I can live with that.:chuckle:
no real running game to speak of for most of his career.
This is getting ridiculous.
Let's look at the running game Peyton Manning had:
Marshall Faulk
1998 - 1,319 yards
Edgerrin James:
1999 - 1,553 yards
2000 - 1,709 yards
Dominic Rhodes
2001 - 1,104 yards
Edgerrin James:
2003 - 1,259 yards
2004 - 1,548 yards
2005 - 1,506 yards
Joseph Addai
2006 - 1,081 yards
2007 - 1,072 yards
Willis McGahee
2011 - 1,199 yards
As we see above, in Peyton Manning's 16 years, he has has a 1,000+ yard running back 10 times.
Edgerrin James is 11th all time for rushing yards with 12,246 yards.
There were 13 1,000 yard rushers this year alone and it's not the running league it used to be. Not so sure hitting 1,000 yards proves much other than that you have a running back that is in the top half as far as individual production.
Oh I think you got there a long time ago.This is getting ridiculous.
Rather, let's look at the effectiveness of the rushing game instead of pretending that having a couple of backs, one great (for a year) and another really good for a couple more makes a difference.Let's look at the running game Peyton Manning had: