Arthur Brain
Well-known member
I wonder if he'll actually come back to the thread to 'clarify' things beyond any reasonable doubt...
Muslims burn 43 more to death....because the 40 last week wasn't enough
- Thread starter Nick M
- Start date
I wonder if he'll actually come back to the thread to 'clarify' things beyond any reasonable doubt...
shagster01
New member
Clarify if you also wanted to kill those people with a nuke, or if you're just all talk.
shagster01
New member
PureX
Well-known member
Of the seven billion people on the planet, I'm sure more than 43 of them were brutally murdered last week by non-Muslims. I don't mean to belittle the murder of these 43, but I do mean to point our Nick's bigoted selectivity.
He's oh-so-outraged about these 43 murders, while he's completely oblivious and uncaring about the 50+ people who were brutally murdered right here in the U.S. last week, by non-Muslims.
He's oh-so-outraged about these 43 murders, while he's completely oblivious and uncaring about the 50+ people who were brutally murdered right here in the U.S. last week, by non-Muslims.
shagster01
New member
No. I am not in favor of warring against 1.6 billion people.
I have no problem targeting specific bad guys that are a direct threat to us, however.
No kidding, get busy and declare you allegiance.
The little boys that Isis and their ilk have kidnapped and forced into military training are ruined for life. They cannot be rehabilitated into decent human beings. This is one of the tragedies of totalitarianism of any kind.
And, tragically, they are now the enemy.
shagster01
New member
I did.
big tough Nick is afraid of a question.
The only difference between Nick and a mass murderer are the resources to do it.
It's a fairly *simple* question. Unless you have a plan to go in pull out all of the pregnant women, infants, toddlers and children, your brilliant plan includes *nuking* them as well.
shagster01
New member
Nick's plan would make him an abortionist.
shagster01
New member
That doesn't justify nuking an entire population.
The best we can hope for is that he has a bad habit of typing before he thinks.
YES, *nuke em* would include innocent unborn babies, infants, toddlers and children who just happen to be unfortunate enough to be located in his "nuke zone".
Yeah, well, they're Muslims and foreigners and stuff, so...:bang:
Oh. Thanks for reminding me. I keep getting swept away in this *innocent baby and children with beating hearts* thing.
My bad.
Arthur Brain
Well-known member
To clarify that your "solution" to such is to actually use nuclear weapons on populations as you've stated and not simply on this thread alone either.
Why so shy Nick?
Rush, you support islam. You do it by going against those that want to stop islam. You are on their side. You can not say you are against them, then go against those who judge islam. You can't say you are against robbing banks, then rob a bank.
You consider this news? The Saudis have been chopping people's heads off for a while, Roger Ramjet.