If it is Stormy it won't be a hole in one.
More trouble for Trump
- Thread starter The Barbarian
- Start date
If it is Stormy it won't be a hole in one.
Will she wear white at the wedding, like Mel at the State of the Uniom (sic) pensioners meeting.
Trump is no angel. But trump does not need money, power, wives or children. He is making America great again for us. Love that guy. I never cared for him ever in the past but I have fully anylized his motives and feel confident that they are pure. Do I consider him a Christian? I don’t know and can’t say. The fact of his daughter’s Judaism is not a good sign. But we elected him to govern not preach. There are many people that fail to reach financial success in our nation but it is not the politician’s faults. It is for one simple reason; They follow the followers. Trump represents me in that I came from nothing, less than nothing to reach financial stability in this greatest land of abundant opportunities. MAGA
Perhaps "intojoy" might want to ask "The Donald" which one of his fiscal policies was responsible for the DOW dropping almost 700 points (2.55%) on Friday - the largest single day decline since the 2008 Recession!
Given that this President has spent the last year taking all the credit for the American economy, one wonders as to why there has been a deafening silence coming from the White House!
Perhaps "intojoy" might want to ask "The Donald" which one of his fiscal policies was responsible for the DOW dropping almost 700 points (2.55%) on Friday - the largest single day decline since the 2008 Recession!
Given that this President has spent the last year taking all the credit for the American economy, one wonders as to why there has been a deafening silence coming from the White House!
No j. Calling this the biggest drop since 08 is abuse. It’s a large drop based on subtraction of a high marker. Not difficult to understand.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
When a President has spent the last 12 months boasting to the American public that he's personally responsible for the "bull market," we shouldn't be surprised when some people might actually take him at his word!
When the economy was recovering under the Obama Administration, Trump was quick to dismiss all the economic indicators as fake - but once he became President, well that's a different story!
Last edited:
It's true. When you start regarding people as "abusive" when they tell the truth, that's probably a clue that you've got a problem.
We get it. When it goes up, Trump is responsible. When it drops, it's not his fault.
No, it isn't hard to understand. That's how he's been, his whole life.
When a President has spent the last 12 months boasting to the American people that he's personally responsible for the "bull market," we shouldn't be surprised that some people might actually take him at his word!
When the economy was recovering under the Obama Administration, Trump was quick to dismiss all the economic indicators as fake - but once he became President, that's a different story!
I think Trump is responsible for a Bull market. He just gets them mixed up.
Is this why he on large dose of Testosterone supplements? Or is that just for his hair loss?
Actually, male pattern baldness can be the result of an excess of testosterone. Lack of testosterone causes elaborate comb-overs.
Are you saying Trump has an excess, causing his baldness, so Trump combs back and over the stuff coming out of his ears; in which case why does he take supplements. Or are you saying Trump is lacking (in testosterone), which gives him lady like long hair?
If Trump is lacking (in male testosterone) does he behave like he does to try and hide it, or is his behaviour a symptom of this deficiency?
When a President has spent the last 12 months boasting to the American public that he's personally responsible for the "bull market," we shouldn't be surprised when some people might actually take him at his word!
When the economy was recovering under the Obama Administration, Trump was quick to dismiss all the economic indicators as fake - but once he became President, well that's a different story!
And you get 70 virgins in heaven. I get it. Sure. Obama recovery, Hahahaha yes!
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
According to Time, former Trump campaign official Carter Page told a book editor he had had the “privilege” of working “informally” for Russia “over the past half year”.
The claims were made in a letter he wrote during a dispute over edits to a manuscript he had submitted for publication.
But the latest revelation shows a FISA warrant would likely have been granted with or without the Steele dossier - a point conveniently left out of the memo and just one in a growing list.
But the latest revelation shows a FISA warrant would likely have been granted with or without the Steele dossier - a point conveniently left out of the memo and just one in a growing list.
The claims were made in a letter he wrote during a dispute over edits to a manuscript he had submitted for publication.
But the latest revelation shows a FISA warrant would likely have been granted with or without the Steele dossier - a point conveniently left out of the memo and just one in a growing list.
But the latest revelation shows a FISA warrant would likely have been granted with or without the Steele dossier - a point conveniently left out of the memo and just one in a growing list.
The memo has already been widely scrutinised and found to be a “misleading dud” but that hasn’t stopped Donald Trump from claiming it “totally vindicates” him in the Special Counsel Russia probe.
Steve Vladeck, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Texas-Austin, said it was unprecedented for the president to feud so publicly with leaders of the U.S. intelligence agencies.
“You do long-term damage to these institutions if you convince a large swath of the American public that they can’t be trusted,” Vladeck said.
Trump’s decision to release the memo has also backfired to a certain extent as the apparent new-found desire for transparency is being selectively applied.
Steve Vladeck, a professor of constitutional law at the University of Texas-Austin, said it was unprecedented for the president to feud so publicly with leaders of the U.S. intelligence agencies.
“You do long-term damage to these institutions if you convince a large swath of the American public that they can’t be trusted,” Vladeck said.
Trump’s decision to release the memo has also backfired to a certain extent as the apparent new-found desire for transparency is being selectively applied.
Even worse, it looks like the republicans on the committee are going to cave to public opinion, and vote to release the democrat memo.
Then Trump will have to decide whether to refuse to declassify it, adding fuel to the fire, or to declassify it, and face the blowback when more details are make public.
Rock and a hard place.
I’m sure Trump will choose what benefits Trump. It’s why we chose him. So he can stick it to the left in the democrat party, Hollywood and the mains stream media folks. Can’t wait.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
