Maths and evolution

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
1. How did this thread get re-opened? It looked closed to me yesterday- as if (gasp!) someone had closed it.
When people promise that all they have is ad hominem and nonsense, I see no point in continuing.
2. Reading the OP, I see "Nearly all [of the] assumptions in that field are in fact self-evidently false." I do not see any mention of what these assumptions supposedly are, and why they are self-evidently false. No, it is not a difficulty in reading on my part, or my avoiding dealing with the question at hand. There really is nothing specific to respond to in the (plagiarized- edit: my apologies- actually not)OP.

Try to engage on the main point. :up:
 

Alate_One

Well-known member
Really? Newton's ideas are "self evidently true"?

The average person assumes a heavier object falls faster than a lighter one. But from experiment, we know this isn't the case.

The average person assumes that living organisms around him are set and cannot be changed. But from experiment we know selection can cause major changes in organisms.

Evolution is inevitable because:

Organisms are variable
That variability is inherited
Many offspring of organisms die due to the interactions of their variations and the environment

For example:
The Rock pocket mouse of the southwest comes in sandy brown and also black due to the sandy desert being interrupted by the black rock. An easy prediction in evolution. Axiomatic you might say . . .
If you started with a group of many colored mice and created an open topped enclosure with a surface painted white, you can imagine which color of mouse would predominate after a few generations.

Rock Pocket Mouse


When humans choose from the variability, we can create big differences in a short period of time.

variants_large_8190.jpg


variants_6760.jpg


Evolution can also be modeled mathematically. One of the common ones is the Hardy-Weinberg equation.
Hardy-Weinberg
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Really? Newton's ideas are "self evidently true"?
Some of them, yes.

The average person assumes a heavier object falls faster than a lighter one.
They do.

The average person assumes that living organisms around him are set and cannot be changed.
Name one person who thinks populations cannot change. :up:

Evolution is inevitable.
Nope. Evolution is just a theory. Feel free to share its axioms.

If you started with a group of many colored mice and created an open topped enclosure with a surface painted white, you can imagine which color of mouse would predominate after a few generations.
That's an axiom? :AMR:

Evolution can also be modeled mathematically. One of the common ones is the Hardy-Weinberg equation.
Of course we know that Hardy-Weinberg equations are useful regardless of the truth of any theory of origins. We were looking for an axiom of evolution.

Try again. :up:
 

Alate_One

Well-known member
Name one person who thinks populations cannot change. :up:
Populations changing in genetic character over time IS evolution.


Biological evolution ... is change in the properties of populations of organisms that transcend the lifetime of a single individual. The ontogeny of an individual is not considered evolution; individual organisms do not evolve. The changes in populations that are considered evolutionary are those that are inheritable via the genetic material from one generation to the next. Biological evolution may be slight or substantial; it embraces everything from slight changes in the proportion of different alleles within a population (such as those determining blood types) to the successive alterations that led from the earliest protoorganism to snails, bees, giraffes, and dandelions."

- Douglas J. Futuyma in Evolutionary Biology, Sinauer Associates 1986



Of course we know that Hardy-Weinberg equations are useful regardless of the truth of any theory of origins. We were looking for an axiom of evolution.
Hardy Weinberg can be used to describe populations changing over time, showing that evolution is happening.

What "origins" are you talking about?
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Populations changing in genetic character over time IS evolution.
Nope. Evolution is the idea that all life is descended from a single common ancestor by means of random mutation and natural selection.

Name one person who does not believe populations can change. :up:

Biological evolution may be slight or substantial; it embraces everything from slight changes in the proportion of different alleles within a population (such as those determining blood types) to the successive alterations that led from the earliest protoorganism to snails, bees, giraffes, and dandelions.
Evolutionists think everything is evolution.

Hardy Weinberg can be used to describe populations changing over time.
And a Bertillon can be used in phrenology. :idunno:

What "origins" are you talking about?
If you don't know what the thread is about, perhaps you should just remain silent. :up:
 

Alate_One

Well-known member
Nope. Evolution is the idea that all life is descended from a single common ancestor by means of random mutation and natural selection.
The book is called "origin of species". Maybe you could read it sometime.

Evolutionists think everything is evolution.
That definition has been in place since Darwin published the idea. You just want to accept the part of evolution that's unbelievably obvious and reject the part that contradicts your beliefs.

You want axioms of evolution?

1. Species come from other species

3. Species are naturally found near similar species

4. Species are found geographically close to fossils that most resemble them

5. Creatures found as fossils in rock are not identical to organisms alive today

6. Fossils deeper in rock strata (older), look less like animals alive today than those from shallower rocks(younger)
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
You want axioms of evolution?

1. Species come from other species

3. Species are naturally found near similar species

4. Species are found geographically close to fossils that most resemble them

5. Creatures found as fossils in rock are not identical to organisms alive today

6. Fossils deeper in rock strata (older), look less like animals alive today than those from shallower rocks(younger)

You do know what an axiom is, right? :chuckle:
 

Stuu

New member
Sorry Stu, I'd hate to take ol' Striper's side on anything, but the source link was just to the right hand side of the OP. However, even in context, there's not much there.
Thanks for pointing it out.

I withdraw and apologise to Stripe.

Stuart
 

Alate_One

Well-known member
Really?

Can you find an exception to the inverse-square law for objects on a macro scale?

Notice you had the caveat "on a macro scale". Laws/Axioms in science aren't always true in all situations situations, that's why we have theories to more fully explain them.

That species come from other species is as certain as cells coming from other cells. We have no evidence showing either of them suddenly popping out of nowhere.
 

Stripe

Teenage Adaptive Ninja Turtle
LIFETIME MEMBER
Hall of Fame
Laws/Axioms in science aren't always true in all situations.
Yes, they are. Do you know what the word means?

That species come from other species is as certain as cells coming from other cells. We have no evidence showing either of them suddenly popping out of nowhere.

Which is of exactly zero relevance.
 

6days

New member
Alate_One said:
You just want to accept the part of evolution that's unbelievably obvious and reject the part that contradicts your beliefs.
The part 'that's painfully obvious' (organisms adapt) *is the part that is consistent with God's Word, and supported by the scientific method.
 
Top