annabenedetti
like marbles on glass
Those are all in the SAME state.
And do you know how well testing was rolled out in that state?
Those are all in the SAME state.
Those are for all of the counties in the state. If you cannot understand how that averages out... You should probably just avoid talking about graphs and data.And do you know how well testing was rolled out in that state?
Those are for all of the counties in the state. If you cannot understand how that averages out... You should probably just avoid talking about graphs and data.
Do you have any reason to believe that the rate of testing would be different between the population of people who wear masks and the population of people who don't wear masks?No, I don't think you understand. New cases isn't the best way to measure, since they're reliant on rate of testing.
Do you have any reason to believe that the rate of testing would be different between the population of people who wear masks and the population of people who don't wear masks?
So you haven't got any then?That's ironic, especially coming from the person who hardly ever provides any evidence of his own.
I think I'll pass this time.
No, I know that you do not understand.No, I don't think you understand. New cases isn't the best way to measure, since they're reliant on rate of testing.
He typically gets his numbers from the CDC. So his "credentials" are quite irrelevant.Not talking about that. Although I still wish I knew his credentials.
new cases of wuflu is how governments decide policiesAgain from @ianmSC, credentials unknown.
What good are new case graphs, though?
He typically gets his numbers from the CDC. So his "credentials" are quite irrelevant.
So do itAnyone can get numbers from the CDC.
So prove he's wrongThat doesn't they can analyze them correctly
new cases of wuflu is how governments decide policies
but most governments only take into account their areas of control
Yes, we can.Anyone can get numbers from the CDC.
What "analysis" is he doing?That doesn't mean they can analyze them correctly, so his credentials are indeed relevant.
I don't have to be curious, since I understand the extremely simple nature of the data that he's presenting.Aren't you even a little bit curious?
Blue states destroy their economies... blue president and blue congress give them money... nothing corrupt there...Lockdowns don't work
Okay, here's an example of what I mean. (Apparently the Covid Tracking Project stopped tracking on 3/7, so I'm using the 7th.)
Currently Hospitalized by State
The COVID Tracking Project collects and publishes the most complete testing data available for US states and territories.covidtracking.com
This gives you a different kind of information, as does number of deaths per million population. The number of cases can be much higher than the tested rate would indicate in a state which did less testing. That's my point. That's all.
Rand Paul asked Fauci to provide scientific research to support his pompous declarations and imperious edicts. Fauci is a buffoon with an enlarged ego. Of course he produced no scientific evidence to back up his mask-wearing nonsense.Because you're a scientific expert where it comes to pandemics and effective measures to curtail the spread?
Nope.
Go follow some more rubbish like "We Are Paul Revere" JR.
It's not looking great for Sweden at this time.
Anyway......... would you want to live in Sweden just now? Or at any time?
Sweden has U-turned on several of its coronavirus measures and is now facing its first lockdown, warns PM
Sweden, which has famously relied on more voluntary measures during the pandemic, continues to struggle in the face of rising coronavirus cases.www.businessinsider.com