Are you blustering right now? Because it sure looks like you just blustered.
Do you have something to say about the OP?
Maryland Considers Teaching Kids That Boys Are Presumed Guilty In Rape Accusations
- Thread starter ClimateSanity
- Start date
Are you blustering right now? Because it sure looks like you just blustered.
Do you have something to say about the OP?
Sure. Rapists should be executed. :thumb:
You mean a bit like coming into threads and irrelevantly blustering on about Darwinism?
:idunno: I haven't supported anything like that.
I didnt say you did, i was commenting on the 'consent' part of your post. Whats stated today to be consent is not reasonable.
Somehow in todays climate, drunk guys can consent and end up in jail, yet a drunk girl who DID consent, is said not to have been able to even when she did, so that drunk guys a rapist now registering as a sex offender when hes no more of one than a rock in my front yard, because feminists who hate men are insane.
Nope. I mean stuff like this:
Which has nothing to do with OP and seems solely designed to hijack the thread.
What do you think about the regulations being considered?
Respond rationally to OP. :up:
Sent from my SM-G9250 using TheologyOnline mobile app
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
Considering I was responding to the author of this thread and her points then how was I "hijacking" it exactly, especially as I considered her comments to be salient to her original post? Considering anna started this thread and not you then your accusation is redundant, much like your usual...
Teaching the value of mutual consent is never a bad thing Stripe and that isn't a quote from Darwin either.
Um, title of your autobiography?
:idunno:
Else feel free to ignore me 95% of the time...
Oh, hmm...
Darwinists love arguing. Anything to keep the discussion away from things they do not like.
Because you're so on topic with the OP: Maryland Considers Teaching Kids That Boys Are Presumed Guilty In Rape Accusations
:chuckle:
If only drunk people weren't hooking up.
Feminists are either too retarded to realize that their notions make men helpless to women who make accusations of rape, or they are immoral, hate men, and want the law to fuel it all.
It's one or the other, (depending on the feminist), and there is no rationalizing it as something else- stop defending insanity :wave2:
It's one or the other, (depending on the feminist), and there is no rationalizing it as something else- stop defending insanity :wave2:
glassjester
Well-known member
I thought children couldn't legally consent.
Didn't they both rape each other, then?
Didn't they both rape each other, then?
glassjester
Well-known member
calling everything from eye contact to inanimate objects rape
Is that what they're doing?
That's exactly what they've been doing :chuckle:
That's why these things are alarming- it's why I ridicule anyone who defends this agenda, because they are idiots
glassjester
Well-known member
That's exactly what they've been doing :chuckle:
That's why these things are alarming- it's why I ridicule anyone who defends this agenda, because they are idiots
Someone actually called eye contact rape?