Scripture says that God has existed eternally. God is the ONE who created female/Woman; so, how could she be God's mother if she has not existed eternally before God??? I mean what? The doesn't even make any sense!
Female didn't exist eternally she was created at a specific time. Adam named her Woman only after she was manifested with a womb and visible in our world. How could Female/Woman have given birth to her eternal Creator? I believe the Bible makes things clear.
Now, if you begin to talk about God as Jesus the Messiah things get a bit more mysterious. One must understand how God works/creates and his purposes. That's a lot.
LOL. That a girl. Strong in faith - right or wrong. I like that.
Now, I will present an argument as to why I believe Mary was not the mother of God. Even Jesus made a statement that would leave most of us wondering: When told, "Behold thy mother and thy brothers stand without, desiring to speak with thee. (Mathew 12:47) He replied: "Who is my mother? and who are my brothers?"
Now, Mary was standing outside want to talk to him. Why didn't he just say clearly, "Bring my mother Mary to me? Instead he proposed a thought provoking question. Hmmm ...
He stretched out his hand toward his disciples, and said, "Behold my mother and brothers! Obviously, he avoided calling Mary his mother. I believe Jesus.
Now why ... for whatever reason on earth would he call believers his mother,brother,family? Could it be the truth?
My thoughts drifted back to the beginning of us ... Genesis 1 and 2.
God already existed and part of God's plan was the Promise he made to Female/Woman. She and male would meet and multiply and produce a family unto God. The Messiah was predestined to come from the first Woman. Her seed plus the Holy Spirit would bring forth the Son of God.
Who was predestined to become God's family? Answer: The genetic codes contained within original mankind/male+female. Male/named Adam and female/named Woman would bring forth God's family.
Then one day I found a scripture in the NT that OPENED MY EYES! Timothy understood things ... I think. Anyway he says he told the truth.
I Timothy 2:7-15 (that's a lot to go over line by line; so, I will just cover verses 13-15
13 For Adam (mankind/male - female) was created first and then Eve (I consider this females third name -female/Woman/Eve).
MY THOUGHTS: You see male female came first. Female/Woman/Eve was separated and became the portal for the entrance of the Messiah. It has taken the birth of millions of Females/Women/Eves to bring the Messiah into the world. It took more than Mary. If at any time the chain was broken then Messiah would not have come. I think time and purity had more of an effect on the choice of Mary and certainly knowing that she would embrace her roll made a difference.
14 And Adam was not deceived, BUT the Woman being deceived was in transgression.
MY THOUGHTS: I theorize that woman deserved judgement. Yet, Timothy explains there was hope for Female/WOMAN/Eve. What was her hope?
15a Not withstanding SHE shall be saved IN CHILDBEARING!
MY THOUGHTS: WOMAN ... women was not lost! She just needed to continue bring forth children and other females until the Messiah arrived. Oh my, I want to weep as I write. Thank You my Lord for saving all women from our transgression in the beginning.
CONCLUSION: All women have been the mother of the Messiah since the beginning... The Messiah who was of her seed and the Holy Spirit. HE brought forth Himself unto Himself through the door he designed ... Woman offered the portal and Mary supplied the necessary sinful flesh of Eve. She did not create/birth/supply the spiritual God - the predestined Messiah.
Jesus made it all fit for my conclusions when he said from the cross: "WOMAN behold YOUR Son." It means so much more than, " Mary behold your son," ... although God's words often have an earthly meaning and a divine spiritual meaning. He spoke to me as a female of the human race.
It took Adam and Eve to bring forth the brothers and sisters of our Messiah until he arrived from God as God. Amen
Alright, so I'd have to say that your posts are a bit all over the place and mostly misses the point that Catholics are making when they refer to Mary as the "Mother of God". In actual fact, it's one of the least offensive doctrines that Catholics hold to. In fact, mostly, objections have to do with the semantics of the title "Mother of God" rather than with what the doctrine actually teaches. When you mix that factor in with the fact that most people don't bother to educate themselves on what the actual doctrine is and what it teaches and why it teaches it, the result is that people are mostly just freaking out over a false perception.
When Catholics call Mary the
Mother of God (from the Greek
Theotokos, “God-bearer”), they are not making Mary greater than God or claiming she existed before Him. The phrase comes from the early Church’s defense of the truth that Jesus is one Person who is both fully God and fully man from the moment of His conception.
The Council of Ephesus in AD 431 used this title to guard against a teaching called Nestorianism, which wrongly split Jesus into two persons—one divine, one human. Calling Mary the
Mother of God was a way of insisting that she gave birth not to “part” of Jesus, but to the one divine Person, God the Son, who had taken on human flesh.
What the title
does affirm:
- Jesus is fully God and fully man from conception.
- Mary is the mother of the Person Jesus, not just of His human side.
- The unity of Christ’s divine and human natures is protected.
What the title
does not mean:
- That Mary is the source of God’s divine nature.
- That Mary is greater than God or existed before Him.
- That Mary’s motherhood includes the Father or the Spirit.
- That Mary is a goddess.
Personally, I can agree with the doctrinal truth the title was meant to protect, yet still feel uneasy about the phrase “Mother of God” in English. In everyday language it can sound as though Mary somehow originated God Himself, which is not at all what the early Church intended. Some prefer biblical phrasing like “Mother of the Lord” (Luke 1:43) or “Mother of Jesus, who is God” to avoid that confusion while affirming the same truth.
The key point is this: the title
Theotokos was never about elevating Mary above God. It was about safeguarding the reality of who Jesus is, God the Son, the eternal Word, made flesh.