ECT MADists don't follow Paul

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Why? It does not include the dbr.

Notice what Paul said:

(Acts 28:32) Preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence, no man forbidding him.

As we see, Paul preached the kingdom AND the dbr at the same time.
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Notice what Paul said:

(Acts 28:32) Preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence, no man forbidding him.

As we see, Paul preached the kingdom AND the dbr at the same time.

Why does the gospel of the kingdom not include the dbr?
Why did Peter switch to another gospel in 1 Peter?
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Why does the gospel of the kingdom not include the dbr?

It couldn't before the cross.

After the cross, Peter and Paul began including it.

Why did Peter switch to another gospel in 1 Peter?

Peter didn't "switch" to another gospel, he did the same thing Paul did in Acts 28:32. He preached the kingdom AND the things that concerned the Lord Jesus Christ.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
:chuckle:

So the gospel of the kingdom before the cross was incomplete?

Nope.

The kingdom didn't change. The kingdom was never to be on planet earth. The d,b,r, was hidden in the OT. There was also mysteries of the kingdom hidden since the foundation of the world.

Christ Jesus spoke of the mysteries hidden since the foundation of the world many years before Paul did. The only difference is that Jesus spoke of them in parables.

(Matt 13:35)That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.[/B]

You guys don't like Matt 13:35, because it shows that Jesus was the first to preach the mysteries hidden since the foundation of the world, not Paul.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
So, Peter preached the gospel of the kingdom (did not include dbr) and also the gospel of Christ (included dbr)?

That's what Paul preached at the end of Acts:

(Acts 28:31) Preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence, no man forbidding him.

Peter doesn't come right out and say it like Paul does in Acts 28:31.

You have to remember that the dbr was hidden in the OT. It took awhile for Peter to understand it.
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
That's what Paul preached at the end of Acts:

(Acts 28:31) Preaching the kingdom of God, and teaching those things which concern the Lord Jesus Christ, with all confidence, no man forbidding him.

Peter doesn't come right out and say it like Paul does in Acts 28:31.

You have to remember that the dbr was hidden in the OT. It took awhile for Peter to understand it.

Why did Peter preach two gospels?
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
You said there was only one gospel.
Did Peter preach two?

Paul says the following in the KJV:

That gospel
My gospel
Our gospel
The gospel of God
The gospel of His Son
The gospel of Christ
The gospel of Peace
The gospel of the uncircumcision
The gospel of the circumcision
The gospel of your salvation
The gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ
The glorious gospel of the blessed God
The gospel of the grace of God

However, most of the time Paul just says "the gospel".

So, when Paul says "the gospel", which one of the gospels in the list is Paul referring to?
 

Danoh

New member
Paul says the following in the KJV:

That gospel
My gospel
Our gospel
The gospel of God
The gospel of His Son
The gospel of Christ
The gospel of Peace
The gospel of the uncircumcision
The gospel of the circumcision
The gospel of your salvation
The gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ
The glorious gospel of the blessed God
The gospel of the grace of God

However, most of the time Paul just says "the gospel".

So, when Paul says "the gospel", which one of the gospels in the list is Paul referring to?

"the gospel" :chuckle:
 

SaulToPaul 2

Well-known member
Paul says the following in the KJV:

That gospel
My gospel
Our gospel
The gospel of God
The gospel of His Son
The gospel of Christ
The gospel of Peace
The gospel of the uncircumcision
The gospel of the circumcision
The gospel of your salvation
The gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ
The glorious gospel of the blessed God
The gospel of the grace of God

However, most of the time Paul just says "the gospel".

So, when Paul says "the gospel", which one of the gospels in the list is Paul referring to?

Check the context.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Check the context.

You should check the Greek.

The word "gospel" is from the Greek noun euangelion, which means "good news", and from the Greek verb euangelizo, which means to bring and/or announce good news.

You want us to believe that Peter was preaching a certain good news, but Paul was preaching a different good news.

IOW, you want us to believe that what was good news to some people, was not good news to other people.

That makes no sense. Good news preached by Paul was not bad news to the people Peter preached to.
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
It couldn't before the cross.

After the cross, Peter and Paul began including it.



Peter didn't "switch" to another gospel, he did the same thing Paul did in Acts 28:32. He preached the kingdom AND the things that concerned the Lord Jesus Christ.

The habitual liar of TOL, little arms Cragie, caught, in another lie, with his "teachings of fallible men" "invention:"



"Why does the gospel of the kingdom not include the dbr?"Mayor STP

"It couldn't before the cross."-Craigie pie


Vs.

"There is just one gospel."-greasy Craigie Bernstein
 

Danoh

New member
You should check the Greek.

The word "gospel" is from the Greek noun euangelion, which means "good news", and from the Greek verb euangelizo, which means to bring and/or announce good news.

You want us to believe that Peter was preaching a certain good news, but Paul was preaching a different good news.

IOW, you want us to believe that what was good news to some people, was not good news to other people.

That makes no sense. Good news preached by Paul was not bad news to the people Peter preached to.

Yep; the Greek.

Never mind just plain old time in Scripture in light of who, what, when, where, why, and how.

Works fine in everyday life.

But when it comes to Scripture; out the window it goes as there are all sorts of "books about" to be over relied on; who has time for time in Scripture.
 

john w

New member
Hall of Fame
You should check the Greek.

Well, well, well....The little arms wimp is getting embarrassed, picked apart, so he/she, in deceit, spams his continual fraud, con game on TOL, with his "the Greek" jazz, when he knows that there is no such thing as "the" Greek, when he knows, and admits, that he knows no "the Greek," cannot read/write/understand/speak it, and could not get a job at a "the Greek" restaurant. Wait...Since you are unemployed, Craigie, perhaps you should apply at a "the Greek" restaurant?

As I have requested, for over 5 years, lying punk:Identify this "the Greek." You have it, sweetie?


Deceiver, fraud-you just plagiarized this "the Greek" jazz from articles/websites, from "fallable men."


The slick, greasy con "man" Craigie "the Geek" won't take me on, touch this post.

Watch.
 

tetelestai

LIFETIME MEMBER
LIFETIME MEMBER
Yep; the Greek.

Never mind just plain old time in Scripture in light of who, what, when, where, why, and how.

Works fine in everyday life.

But when it comes to Scripture; out the window it goes as there are all sorts of "books about" to be over relied on; who has time for time in Scripture.

Why would the good news Paul preached not be good news for the people Peter preached to?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
Top