Do you see how MADists will dodge this?
The hit parade of cliches marches on...
Quite stunning.
Any christian in the world of any denomination will understand this.
Ssssssssssss......
Do you see how MADists will dodge this?
Any christian in the world of any denomination will understand this.
He is being bloodied, on the mat, in a heap, his only defense being, "Well, at least I lasted a round against the great STP, and my minions will arrive shortly, to re-pump me up with some more mysticism, and stock cliches, and grunts, and snorts...."
He challenged the "faith OF Christ".
I quoted irrefutable scripture.
He changed the subject and declared victory.
Typical, wouldn't you say, saint john?
What?Two different kingdoms.
Israel - which they inherited through natual birth.
Heaven - which is inherited through spiritual birth.
He challenged the "faith OF Christ".
I quoted irrefutable scripture.
He changed the subject and declared victory.
Typical, wouldn't you say, saint john?
You're insisting I changed the subject, but it is you applying the wrong interpretation to the passage
Never heard that closer before.
Regardless, the fact that it is the FAITH OF CHRIST in the passage is irrefutable.
The fact that in the KJV there is the "faith of the gospel", and the "faith of the operation of God" is irrefutable.
People still understand it as faith IN the gospel, and faith IN the operation of God.
You want to take advantage of the old english rendering for doctrinal purposes, because that is your agenda.
Regardless, the fact that it is the FAITH OF CHRIST in the passage is irrefutable.
He was the seed to whom the promise was made, and received it by faith. You can let your countenance be fallen all you want, and seek to rise up and slay me if you want, but it won't change that fact.
It's been laid out for you scripturally. It's been shown to you in modern translations. You're in denial of spiritual sonship though faith in Christ.
Basically your interpretation is a disaster, and it shows how desperate people can be to grasp hold of a crazy theory in order to salvage a doctrine.
Regardless, the fact that it is the FAITH OF CHRIST in the passage is irrefutable.
He was the seed to whom the promise was made, and received it by faith. You can let your countenance be fallen all you want, and seek to rise up and slay me if you want, but it won't change that fact.
Obviously the problem with STP's interpretation is that if Christ is the one receiving the promise of the Spirit through his own faith, it means that Jesus himself needed to be born again.
Nope.
Christ is the seed to whom the promise was made, and he receive it by his faith.
Irrefutable.
You don't have to like it, but you will never change it.
Andy, your OP is, total fiction! Madism is a 1000 miles away from Calvinism!
In fact, it's not even in the same Universe!
1) Calvins believe the "elect" were chosen before the foundation of the world!
The Madists disagree!
2)The Calvins don't believe in man's free-will choice!
The Madists do!
3) The Calvins believe man is too sinfully disgusting to
even want to place their faith in Christ!
The Madists believe that man, must place his faith in
Christ to be saved!
4) Some Calvins believe God creates all sin!
The Madists think that's insane!
5) The Calvins believe that, man must first be,
regenerated before they can place their faith
in Christ!
The Madists believe man must place his faith
before regeneration can take place!
How dare you compare false doctrine (Calvinism)
with true doctrine? (Paul's Gospel)
:up:This should settle the faith OF Christ issue once and for all:
How is the promise received?
Galatians 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
Who was the promise made unto?
Galatians 3:16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
Galatians 3:19 Wherefore then serveth the law? It was added because of transgressions, till the seed should come to whom the promise was made; and it was ordained by angels in the hand of a mediator
The promise was made to the seed, Christ, and received by his faith.
How do we get it??
Galatians 3:22 But the scripture hath concluded all under sin, that the promise by faith of Jesus Christ might be given to them that believe.
The fact that in the KJV there is the "faith of the gospel", and the "faith of the operation of God" is irrefutable.
People still understand it as faith IN the gospel, and faith IN the operation of God.
You want to take advantage of the old english rendering for doctrinal purposes, because that is your agenda.
Listen up, Opie. Little kids learn through repetition. And, if there is one thing that I've learned, after years of surveying, studying, and meditating on this book, is that it is a book of details. A word, and, yes, words, do matter, as the Holy Spirit, is very meticulous in the words He employs, in contrast to you,who demonstrates lackadaisical disregard for the details of the "volume of the book."
As an example:
Romans 3:30 KJV
Seeing it is one God, which shall justify the circumcision by faith, and uncircumcision through faith.
Let me guess: It all says the same thin', Lucy, as "by faith"="through faith," as it all says/means the same thin'.
Go ahead, bray like a j, and keep "arguing" that-you can "prove" anythin you want, red Lucy. "Knock yourself out"(The "modern" 'the' English).
Yeah Yeah Yeah