Agreed.
Repentance is a change of mind.
But some try to say that repentance is a change of behavior.
Only to those who say repentance is a change of behavior.
All still sin whether they have changed their mind (repentance) about sin or not.
ECT MADist thought for the day
- Thread starter andyc
- Start date
- Status
Repentance is a change of mind.
But some try to say that repentance is a change of behavior.
All still sin whether they have changed their mind (repentance) about sin or not.
andyc
New member
andyc
New member
:thumb:
So if a change of mind is required, and repentance is a change of mind, repentance is a requirement.
Acts 17:30 "Truly, these times of ignorance God overlooked, but now commands all men everywhere to repent
One In Christ
New member
Repentance is a fact of the matter, not a requirement... See my post #533
One In Christ
New member
It is a literal impossibility for someone to come to Christ without repentance.
But it is not a requirement for salvation
Think that through..
But it is not a requirement for salvation
Think that through..
Prove that I did not write it.
http://mail.bigwestracing.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80002&page=30
http://ns1.ericguttormson.com/forums/showthread.php?t=80002&page=29
"You are a liar John
I have NEVER copied and pasted anything on TOL without putting it in a text box, changing the color of the font, and giving credit to who wrote it by giving the name or giving a link.
You on the other hand are a plagiarizer.
You copied and pasted someone else’s article, and claimed it was yours.
You lie, check anywhere on the internet, I have NEVER copied and pasted.
Andy C proved that you are a plagiarizer, and now you are proving to be a liar also.
You need help."-Tet.
Tet., on TOL-post # 8
: http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2639922#post2639922
Top Ten Reason the Dispensationalist Did Not Cross the Road
10. Thought he would be raptured before he got there anyway.
9. Thought that the other side was for the ‘Israel’, and this side was for the ‘church’.
8. Charles Ryrie was still on this side of the road, why cross?
7. Thought it was pointless since Jesus was just going to bring him back after 7 years.
6. Like the OT prophets and the church age, he was unable to see the other side.
5. He was afraid that if he went, there would be nothing to restrain the man of lawlessness.
4. He was not a part of the dispensation of ‘crossing’.
3. Dallas Theological Seminary hadn’t yet published anything telling him how to do it.
2. Thought there was a two thousand foot gap between the 69th and 70th step.
1. By taking a consistently literal approach, he thought that ‘cross the road’ meant something about the crucifixion.
http://www.reclaimingthemind.org/bl...the-dispensationalist-did-not-cross-the-road/
Top Ten Reason the Dispensationalist Did Not Cross the Road
10. Thought he would be raptured before he got there anyway.
9. Thought that the other side was for the ‘Israel’, and this side was for the ‘church’.
8. Charles Ryrie was still on this side of the road, why cross?
7. Thought it was pointless since Jesus was just going to bring him back after 7 years.
6. Like the OT prophets and the church age, he was unable to see the other side.
5. He was afraid that if he went, there would be nothing to restrain the man of lawlessness.
4. He was not a part of the dispensation of ‘crossing’.
3. Dallas Theological Seminary hadn’t yet published anything telling him how to do it.
2. Thought there was a two thousand foot gap between the 69th and 70th step.
1. By taking a consistently literal approach, he thought that ‘cross the road’ meant something about the crucifixion.
http://www.theologyonline.com/forums/showthread.php?t=66121
Post #1
From a Preterist site:
http://www.livebytr.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=any&action=display&thread=77
http://free-in-truth.blogspot.com/2008/05/humor-top-ten-reason-dispensationalist.html
"I never said...."-Tet
Wile E. Coyote
New member
Old covenant repentance was pre salvific and a one time act. New covenant repentance is post salvific and is ongoing. But it cannot save me.
andyc
New member
No it doesn't save, it produces the inner desire to be saved. Without the understanding of what we're being saved from, we have no reason to call on the savior.
Wile E. Coyote
New member
Previously you said that repentance is a "requirement" for salvation. Now you say it does not save.
Which is it?
andyc
New member
A plane ticket is required to get me to Seattle, but it's not the plane ticket that gets me there, its the plane.
Repentance is simply what opens our heart to receive forgiveness, but it is by grace through faith that we are saved. Repentance is simply a corresponding product of faith. "Save me Lord".
SaulToPaul 2
Well-known member
I was thinking of this as I rode my "motorsickle" out to get set up for Checkpoint Chickie.
I pm'ed "Dispy" over at the other site.
I copied and pasted a joke once on TOL. I have never copied and pasted anything else.
What you have done over and over again, is not even close to me pasting a joke.
You have been caught red handed AGAIN, and your only solution is to keep lying about it, and attack me.
andyc
New member
Acts 8:13 Then Simon himself also believed; and when he was baptized he continued with Philip, and was amazed, seeing the miracles and signs which were done.
Simon believed and was even baptised, but was he saved?
Peter said to him.........
21 "You have neither part nor portion in this matter, for your heart is not right in the sight of God. 22 "Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you. 23 "For I see that you are poisoned by bitterness and bound by iniquity."
Simon's faith wasn't genuine.
Simon believed and was even baptised, but was he saved?
Peter said to him.........
21 "You have neither part nor portion in this matter, for your heart is not right in the sight of God. 22 "Repent therefore of this your wickedness, and pray God if perhaps the thought of your heart may be forgiven you. 23 "For I see that you are poisoned by bitterness and bound by iniquity."
Simon's faith wasn't genuine.
andyc
New member
I think everyone knows W copied it, but I would laugh so hard if dispy copied it from W. He is a dispy after all ha ha!
One doesn't have to be a literary expert to tell if Johnny wrote it.
I read other posts by "Dispy", it was definitely written by "Dispy", and not written by Johnny.
Yet Johnny will continue to lie about it, and the other dispies on this site will encourage him, and give him accolades for his posts.
glorydaz
Well-known member
Repent and believe...two sides of the same faith coin. :thumb:
andyc
New member
:idunno: ... Honestly, I don't really care if he copied it or not... Not my problem
One In Christ
New member
Still not my problem Andy... Just stating how I feel.
andyc
New member
One In Christ
New member
You report a lot of people when they break the rules
I've seen the woodshed.
I only report offenders that I find annoying.... Is that against the rules?
- Status