No it wasn't.
The temple still stood, and the early Jewish Christians still observed the Mosaic Law.
It became irrelevent with the beginning of the new covenant which obsoleted the old covenant.
Just because men still did some things of the old covenant did not mean any of it was still in force.
There were other things that happened in 70AD besides the destruction of the temple.
Nope, you are wrong.
Heb 8:13 was written around 65Ad.
At that time the New Covenant had been made, and it made the Old Covenant obsolete.
Because the NC had made the OC obsolete, it would soon disappear (it did in 70AD)
It became irrelevent with the beginning of the new covenant which obsoleted the old covenant.
Just because men still did some things of the old covenant did not mean any of it was still in force.
The pouring out of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost made it clear that the new covenant was in force, and the new obsoleted the old.
There were not both the old and the new in force at the same time.
The veil was rent in two at the death of Christ , not in AD 70.
I wonder if G&P will not tackle you on this, but if she is honest about her intentions then she should, and has no choice but to do so.
LA.