You are MAD is a mess ? Learn your contractions, it's no wonder you can't read the Bible properly.You're MAD is a mess.
Your Catholic based preterism founded by a catholic named Luis de Alcasar is a complete and total mess
You are MAD is a mess ? Learn your contractions, it's no wonder you can't read the Bible properly.You're MAD is a mess.
So are you saying that Jesus would have stoned the man and the woman to death if everything had been done according to how you think it should have been done?
It's actually irrelevant BTW,
COULDN'T condemn her. Without the man present, He would have violated His own Law by condemning her.
No it doesn't.
The woman may have believed later. Maybe she didn't. We can't know.
But as far as what the Record DOES say, she appears to have gone away in unbelief. Relieved that she wasn't stoned, sure, and maybe convicted...but no indication she repented, so no indication that He forgave her.
Sorry you don't like that that's what it says, but that's what it says.
Condemnation is not just death itself. To be condemned is the fact that her sin is unforgivable from a legal perspective. What you're implying is that her sin was not going to put her in a grave immediately, but she was still guilty and condemned by God through the law.
No other christian sect on the planet is going to agree with you here because it is so monumentally insane. That's why at the start of this thread I warned everyone to get ready for the kind of nonsense you are merrily throwing up on our screens.
Believed what?
There's no forgiveness of adultery under the law?
From your perspective, there was no possible hope of forgiveness. The penalty for adultery is death.
How was David forgiven his adultery, murder, covetousness, etc?
What's the one clear, Biblical difference between David and the adulterous woman?
(and it isn't that David was a man or the king, either)
Answer the question. What's the main difference between adulterous David and the adulterous woman, as far as what we know of each?
You already know the answer. That's why you're not touching it.
Dealt with it before you even arrived :chuckle:
Who does this adultress woman that He forgives represent?
What adultress womean is it the Law and the Prophets prophesy the God of Israel will forgive of her sin of adultry one day?
And what - oh never mind...the Mads know what I am going on about...
See post 10.
Then apologize to me.
How was David forgiven his adultery, murder, covetousness, etc?
What's the one clear, Biblical difference between David and the adulterous woman?
(and it isn't that David was a man or the king, either)
Vicarious lawkeeping is a lie.
If He kept the Law FOR us ("lived a perfect life on our behalf" as some say), rather than just dying for our sins and rising for our justification, then He Himself would need not have died since in effect no one would have broken the Law by virtue of His having kept it for us. We'd be absolved by His perfect lawkeeping and, thus freed, the Cross would have been pointless.
When used lawfully.Yeah, the law condemns adulterers and adulteresses.
Israel.What adultress womean is it the Law and the Prophets prophesy the God of Israel will forgive of her sin of adultry one day?
The finger of GOD.What were the Ten Commandnents originally written with?
His finger.What is Jesus using to write on the ground the obvious list of each their sins with?
There is no record of that happening. Speculation.So are you saying that Jesus would have stoned the man and the woman to death if everything had been done according to how you think it should have been done?
A theological trap about the law.It's actually irrelevant BTW, because it was more of a theological trap, not an actual trial.
Israel.