I don't rule that out.The snipers, of course, were the criminals in this case. You don't think there was an attempt to tie the snipers to BLM in this thread?
Listen. moron, I do not approve of police brutality of anyone for the sole purpose of hating their race.To right it was.
It was a reaction to the numerous dubious shootings of black people by white police officers.
That is an obvious fact.
What doesn't seem obvious is that both are clearly wrong. You seem in abject denial about the issue the escalated into this confrontation.
What would people on this board be suggesting if black police officers were regularly murdering and abusing white citizens because of racial profiling. I'm sure more than one would be shouting for 'civil war' and the shooting the black police officers.
The denial of this clear problem is part of the build it to today's events.
What has seemed to happen today is that 4 citizens of the USA chose to fight the authorities and probably die, because they were so disgusted by the lack of justice afforded to there racial grouping within the USA.
To an extent these men were not overly different to the Oregon protestors, just at a different extreme, and from a different racial grouping, they were more direct and ruthless than the guys at Oregon, but they had the same sense of alienation and not belonging and were willing to take it to the end of the line.
Yes.So was there more than one shooter?
We know why he did it.No one had taken sides, and read the first line.
Incidents don't happen in vacumes, events lead up and away from tragic events. Asking questions round them may give you the ability to consider limiting the chances of them happening again.
Moral indignation may make you feel more certain about the uncertain world you live in and how wonderful you are, but gives you no ability to consider ways to limit this from happening again.
We live in a country where citizens have the right to bear arms ........ so we can shoot back at lunatics committing a shooting frenzy.How in the world has the public got fire power like this in America?
I don't rule that out.
We live in a country where citizens have the right to bear arms ........ so we can shoot back at lunatics committing a shooting frenzy.
And provide the lunatics with plenty of arms....We live in a country where citizens have the right to bear arms ........ so we can shoot back at lunatics committing a shooting frenzy.
Yes exactly, and isn't the right to bear bazookas enshrined in the Constitution?Why in the world would the general public need a high powered rifle with telescopic sight?
Why not give them a tank?
Live in the South and you won't wonder. Warm seasons a hundred degrees or better with humidity you normally find in a swimming pool. Couple that with firearms and ta-da! Mayhem ensues.Americans, for a western "liberal" democracy, live in an uniquely violent society. You don't see anywhere near the bloodshed and suffering in Canada, Britain, Europe, Australia etc. Obviously there's an abundance of firearms, making killing easier, but what I'm wondering is what makes American culture so violent...
Why in the world would the general public need a high powered rifle with telescopic sight?
Why not give them a tank?
Go to time 1:24 of this video.Americans, for a western "liberal" democracy, live in an uniquely violent society. You don't see anywhere near the bloodshed and suffering in Canada, Britain, Europe, Australia etc. Obviously there's an abundance of firearms, making killing easier, but what I'm wondering is what makes American culture so violent...