Yep. It would be like Fred Plummer vs. Big Barn.
No contest.
With my word of God judo chops......
Yep. It would be like Fred Plummer vs. Big Barn.
No contest.
So, is it my fault that you cannot understand even your own NT? I am not even talking to you in the Tanach but in Luke 16:29-31. Of course I understand that Jesus was talking grace when he advised us all to listen to "Moses" aka the Law in order to enjoy freedom from the torments caused by the consequences of a broken Law. You are the one who cannot see that far.
You are not qualified to be in the ring with me, student. Take your seat.
Yep. It would be like Fred Plummer vs. Big Barn.
No contest.
Also the bible speaks of works of the flesh/law and works of the Spirit/faith.
Christians are required to have works of the Spirit so Jesus and James weren't preaching a different gospel.
Please refute this as well.
Actually it's "fruit" of the Spirit, suggesting they are not things from as much conscious, calculating effort as "works."
Also the bible speaks of works of the flesh/law and works of the Spirit/faith.
Christians are required to have works of the Spirit so Jesus and James weren't preaching a different gospel.
Please refute this as well.
The flash, not the spirit is the side that suffers the pains as a result of the consequences of a broken Law. So, if it is up to me to choose the way I should walk, I'll go according to the Law and forever thanks
HaShem for His grace to have granted us with the Law. No wonder Jesus taught: Listen to "Moses" aka the Law. (Luke 16:29-31)
The flash, not the spirit is the side that suffers the pains as a result of the consequences of a broken Law. So, if it is up to me to choose the way I should walk, I'll go according to the Law and forever thanks HaShem for His grace to have granted us with the Law. No wonder Jesus taught: Listen to "Moses" aka the Law. (Luke 16:29-31)
Let's start with a simple one there were Jewish and Gentile believers in the same church of the 1st century. No D'ist separation gospel.
Let's start with a simple one there were Jewish and Gentile believers in the same church of the 1st century. No D'ist separation gospel.
Ben, I have a few questions for you. Why did you choose to spend time on a Christian forum? Why not a Jewish forum? Do you have some sort of agenda to "proselytize?" Do you enjoy arguing/confrontation? What motivates you?
because the founder of Christianity aka Paul picked up a Jew to vandalize his Faith which was Judaism which just happened to be the same as mine.
Paul sent people to the law! The law reveals sin and a sinner needs a savior. Do you see how that works?
But now the righteousness of God without the law is manifested, being witnessed by the law and the prophets; Even the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe: for there is no difference: For all have sinned, and come short of the glory of God; Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Rom. 3:21-24
The righteousness of Christ is separate and distinct from the law.
Explain the above? You mean, below.
Quote Originally Posted by Ben Masada View Post
because the founder of Christianity aka Paul picked up a Jew to vandalize his Faith which was Judaism which just happened to be the same as mine.
1 - If you read Acts 11:26, it was as a result of Paul's works in the Nazarene Synagogue of Antioch that Christians were called Christians for the first time. Hence, Paul founded Christianity.
2 - Paul picked up a Jew aka Jesus to teach anti-Jewish doctrines through him. Hence, vandalism of a religion by another.
3 - I am Jewish. So, Judaism happened to have been the same Faith of Jesus then and of myself now.
The only way to get grace from Moses is to realize that sinners can never keep the law no matter how hard they try. You haven't learned the lesson.
Explain the above? You mean, below.
Paul picked up a Jew aka Jesus to teach anti-Jewish doctrines through him. Hence, vandalism of a religion by another.
Is this from first-hand information? Were you there? This sounds like a "National Enquirer" type fabrication. What I see here, you're saying that Paul used Christ as some kind of puppet? Is this what you're insinuating?
See what I mean by vandalism of Judaism aka the Law? No, Paul sent no one to the Law. The opposite is rather true that he released his followers from the Law claiming that it had ended with the death Jesus by being abolished on the cross. (Romans 7:6; 10:4; Ephesians 2:15; etc) That's Replacement Theology and, etc because it goes throughout the NT. Hence, it became known as the gospel of Paul.