both as Spirit and then as flesh. I completely disagree on both points (among others).
I don't agree with everything he claims, but he is not vile like those trin believer persecutors such as you.
He does not have evil spirit like many of you.
both as Spirit and then as flesh. I completely disagree on both points (among others).
No.
You could easily make a statement that you do believe Jesus was without spot and that His shed blood did atone for sin.
but instead you say I am lying.
LA
There are two sitting on the throne, father and son.
You assume too much. And no, the filioque wasn't the only one.
Incorrect. It is contained in the Textus Receptus
Please do not put up links as such. I am giving you a courtesy of just removing the link this time. Next I you will be given a timeout for posting spam. TOL is not to be a clearing house for this kind of stuff.This verse can be variously translated and does NOT indicate or prove Jesus is YHWH, but simply refers to the appearing of God's glory in the person of the Lord Jesus. Paul in the previous chapter and almost all of his epistles clearly makes a distinction between God the Father and the Lord Jesus.
For more on this passage go Link Removed. :thumb: