God's Truth
New member
Yes, she does, and so do I.
That is what I said.
Now you both need to stop derailing the thread.
Yes, she does, and so do I.
You are allowed to change font and size for some special posts, but regular discussion use the default type and size
That is what I said.
Now you both need to stop derailing the thread.
Zechariah 12:10"And I will pour out on the house of David and the inhabitants of Jerusalem a spirit of grace and supplication. They will look on me, the one they have pierced, and they will mourn for him as one mourns for an only child, and grieve bitterly for him as one grieves for a firstborn.
This scripture proves they are EXACTLY the same.
No matter who you think is saying this, whether or not you think it is God the Father or Jesus speaking---this is proof they are the exact same.
[MENTION=16505]CherubRam[/MENTION] Please use plain text and leave off the special formatting. It's turning in pages and pages of text on some devices. I have removed the formatting from your posts. Please stick with typing in the normal TOL font.
Oh dear. So is Ariel Black not supposed to be used, either? I've been doing that and the size on occasion.:shocked:
[MENTION=16505]CherubRam[/MENTION] Please use plain text and leave off the special formatting. It's turning in pages and pages of text on some devices. I have removed the formatting from your posts. Please stick with typing in the normal TOL font.
Is that the fonts that show up on here? Like Ariel black? Is that allowed at all?
Or, never choose any of the other fonts it shows on here? :idunno:
Tell us how YOU see it GT.
Trying to get an idea on how you think that proves you point.
Sent from my iPad using TOL
It proves Jesus is God Incarnate.
If you are having problems viewing it, then he shouldn't be using it.Oh, maybe I was right? :idunno:
That is Jesus speaking in the Old Testament, even though he is not yet known as Jesus.
God in the Old Testament is speaking as the Father.
So now read that scripture again with the realization that it is Jesus speaking about seeing him pierced.
That makes Jesus as the Father speaking of himself crucified.
Sherman said it was not a problem so, it is not a problem. I was going by past rules.
But Jesus was not born yet? Maybe it was the logos GT.
I am trying to show you that they are the exact same. Why don't you finish hearing me out?The point being that the son is not the father.
The logos which came down to dwell in Jesus was active in the OT. So there really is no proof to prove your point. I do see how you pieced it together though.
It was a problem for you, so it's a problem.
Really I do not mind so much. I try to help out with the forum as much as I can.
Really I do not mind so much. I try to help out with the forum as much as I can.