freelight
Eclectic Theosophist
Up for grabs..............
Up for grabs..............
In the past I used their greek interlinear NT with the wescott/hort word for word along with their paraphrase....so a fun resource to use....with others of course. I think the demonizing of JWs is a bit overrated....and one can logically hold a Unitarian position with or without their help. They do have scholarly supports for their positions in any case, although orthodox christians will naturally contend against those to maintain their apologetics. So Jesus is a 'god'.....awesome! I see no problem there :idunno: - there are gods, sons of God, angels, cosmic beings and messengers all sent by God and serving God. So? The only ones fighting this are orthodox Trinitarians.
And im very liberal as being of the Eclectic school and do my own study and research on religious and philosophical subjects valuing any scholarship involved in such and my own considerations, staying open to learn.
As far as WHO Jesus is is up for grabs beyond scriptural passages and the various interpretations of such. I think some put too strong a dogmatic conclusion on matters when a much more figurative and fluid presentation of Jesus would do just as fine if not better.
Up for grabs..............
Let's NOT...it's a blatant false translation, as the JWs have no real scholars amongst them.
In the past I used their greek interlinear NT with the wescott/hort word for word along with their paraphrase....so a fun resource to use....with others of course. I think the demonizing of JWs is a bit overrated....and one can logically hold a Unitarian position with or without their help. They do have scholarly supports for their positions in any case, although orthodox christians will naturally contend against those to maintain their apologetics. So Jesus is a 'god'.....awesome! I see no problem there :idunno: - there are gods, sons of God, angels, cosmic beings and messengers all sent by God and serving God. So? The only ones fighting this are orthodox Trinitarians.
Very liberal note, but the fact is Jesus said whoever denies Him before men, He will deny before His Father. That includes WHO He actually and truly is.
And im very liberal as being of the Eclectic school and do my own study and research on religious and philosophical subjects valuing any scholarship involved in such and my own considerations, staying open to learn.
As far as WHO Jesus is is up for grabs beyond scriptural passages and the various interpretations of such. I think some put too strong a dogmatic conclusion on matters when a much more figurative and fluid presentation of Jesus would do just as fine if not better.