Jerry Shugart
Well-known member
They will judge the twelve tribes.
Then why did you say that the different tribes must be judged only by those belonging to that tribe?
You are making a fool out of yourself!
They will judge the twelve tribes.
I believe Paul in the context of the way that he says what he says.Even us, whom he hath called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles? As he saith also in Osee, I will call them my people, which were not my people; and her beloved, which was not beloved. And it shall come to pass, that in the place where it was said unto them, Ye are not my people; there shall they be called the children of the living God. Romans 9:24-26
You both reject Paul like all Dispensational flesh worshippers. The house of Israel are said to cease and be no more by Hosea:
And the LORD said unto him, Call his name Jezreel; for yet a little while, and I will avenge the blood of Jezreel upon the house of Jehu, and will cause to cease the kingdom of the house of Israel. And it shall come to pass at that day, that I will break the bow of Israel in the valley of Jezreel. And she conceived again, and bare a daughter. And God said unto him, Call her name Loruhamah: for I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel; but I will utterly take them away. Hosea 1:4-6
In the 1st century the house of Judah (Judah, Benjamin) was the only ethnic house remaining. The house of Israel was scattered among the nations and intermingled with the Gentiles like the Samaritans. The Jews didn't consider the Samaritans to be the tribes of Israel and despised them. Many of the Samaritans who believed on Christ were of the lost tribes of Israel who were not God's people but now are called God's people.
OK, I somewhat see your point. But then why do you think that this stewardship continued until Acts 28 and ended there?
Many of those that were given the PS (Pentecostal Stewardship) were not active the later chapters of the book of Acts. For example, Peter was a prominent member of that group and yet he completely disappears from the book of Acts after chapter 15. It's also notable that Luke was a traveling companion with the twelve up until Acts 16, where he thereafter associated with Paul and his companions. There is a clear and abrupt change in the personal pronouns in Acts 16 with regards to US and THEM.
While I agree with all of that, I still don't see how you make Acts 28 the marker. Is it simply because that is where the book ends?According to prophecy the Gentiles are to brought to the knowledge of God through the agency of the nation of Israel:
"Behold, thou shalt call a nation that thou knowest not, and nations that knew not thee shall run unto thee because of the LORD thy God, and for the Holy One of Israel; for he hath glorified thee" (Isa.55:3,5).
"For I the LORD love judgment, I hate robbery for burnt offering; and I will direct their work in truth, and I will make an everlasting covenant with them. And their seed shall be known among the Gentiles, and their offspring among the people: all that see them shall acknowledge them, that they are the seed which the LORD hath blessed" (Isa.61:8-9).
The Twelve and the disciples of the Lord Jesus would not go to the Gentiles until the nation of Israel was glorified and blessed by the LORD. Even though the nation was cast aside at Acts 7 the LORD wanted the Jewish believers to continue to preach to the Jews so as to leave that nation with no excuse for rejecting the Lord Jesus Christ.
Ah the wonderful Christian name calling.I'm not going to derail the other thread of Jerry Shutheart and Wrong Divider.
He's clearly missing quite a few pages throughout.I have already proved by what is written at Jeremiah 31:31-34 that the promises of the New Covenant will be fulfilled to the physical descendants of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob and all you do is deny what is written there.
Does your Bible not have an Old Testament?
God doesn't laugh at His Body. As to the Lord's supper (having nothing to do with the Body): 1 Corinthians 11:20 When ye come together therefore into one place, this is not to eat the Lord's supper.That's what Christ does when Dispies partake of the Lord's supper with their unholy lips.
Some would argue that Galatians is the first that Paul wrote...I thought it was Galatians that was written first...
especially, coming from LA LostThick irony...
You deny the cross as the power of God and couldn't tell anyone if one is saved or lost from your blind standpoint (2 Corinthians 4:3-4 KJV). "just saying."Not everyone stay the same and many don't even know what Christianity is all about.
Self assurance is another root of corruption of many churches, imo.
just saying.
I am saved by the gospel declared in 1 Corinthians 15:1-4 KJV and acknowledge who God says that the NC will be with (the house of Israel and with the house of Judah-Hebrews 8:8 KJV), but that isn't us. I encourage you to believe what saith the scripture about who it will be with instead of your preconceived notions of trying to insert yourself into everything.Any so-called Christian who rejects the new covenant promise is an imposter filled with unbelief.
The body of Christ are all those who believe in Christ, lol. The dispensational lies are so bad that anyone who believes them is not worthy. God requires us to believe his revealed word and you reject it in every post. False prophets are allowed by God to separate the wheat from the chaff.
Enemies of the cross are those who mind earthly things (Philippians 3:19 KJV). That sounds more like you than those who follow Paul.Dispensationalists who reject the new covenant promise with their man-made religion are enemies of the cross.
:chuckle:There are only two dispensations being the old and new testament.
A future which has NOTHING to do with the church, the Body of Christ.Jesus said the disciples would sit on 12 thrones and judge the 12 tribes of Israel - Matt. 19:28.
They will judge the twelve tribes. The twelve converted apostles will judge the spiritual house of Israel and the spiritual house of Judah or the household of faith.
While I agree with all of that, I still don't see how you make Acts 28 the marker. Is it simply because that is where the book ends?
It's like you have a script that you never deviate from no matter what question you're asked.The Jews continued to keep the law throughout the Acts period (see Acts 21: 20-26). Many people ask, since Paul was teaching the churches which he founded that they are no longer under the law, (Gal. 3: 23-25) then why did the Jews in the Jerusalem church continue to keep the law?
Once again.... agreed.When Paul went to Jerusalem at Acts 21 he too kept the law, even going so far as to make offerings required under the law (Acts21:26). I believe the following words of Paul explain his actions at Acts 21: 26:
"And unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews; to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law" (1 Cor. 9: 20).
I believe that it was of the will of God for the Jerusalem church to remain under the law, and His reason would be so that He might gain those who were under the law. But this did not remain in effect. In his role as the "apostle to the Gentiles" the Apostle Paul had gone throughout the Roman Empire preaching to the Gentiles, and when he arrived at a new town or city the first thing which he did was to go the the Jews and speak in their synagogues. He was also fulfilling the Lord’s commandment that he should also go to "the children of Israel" (Acts 9: 15).
Still not seeing why you think that Acts 28 is the marker. Paul was not a circumcision apostle though he did preach to unbelieving Israel. Why would Acts 28 be the "end of the law" for the circumcision apostles? I don't see how "his ministry to the Jews ended" has anything to do with the ministry of what was left of the twelve and their disciples.His ministry to the Jews ended when he was carried as a prisoner to Rome and spoke before the Jews there. Sir Robert Anderson says,"When these, the Jews of Rome, refused the proffered mercy, his mission to his nation was at an end; and for the first time separating himself from them, he exclaimed,’ Well spake the Holy Ghost through Isaiah the prophet unto your fathers’—and he went on to repeat the words which our Lord Himself had used at that kindred crisis of His ministry when the nation had openly rejected Him (Acts xxviii. 25 R.V.; Matt. xiii. 13, cf. xii. 14-16)" (Anderson, The Silence of God, Appendix, Note # 3, p.175).
We can see that a change did come about after Paul’s ministry to the children of Israel had ended by the witness of the Jewish epistles (which were written after the Acts period had ended). During the Acts period the Jews continued to keep the law, and Peter described the law as a "yoke" which the Jews were not able to bear (Acts 15: 10). But by the time Peter wrote his first epistle we read that the Jews were "free" and at "liberty" from the law:
"As free, and not using your liberty for a cloak of maliciousness, but as the servants of God" (1 Pet.2:16).
Peter’s words there practically mirror Paul’s when he is speaking of the law:
"For, brethren, ye have been called unto liberty; only use not liberty for an occasion to the flesh, but by love serve one another" (Gal.5:13).
"Stand fast therefore in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free, and be not entangled again with the yoke of bondage" (Gal.5:1).
The author of Hebrews also says that the law has been annulled: "For there is verily an annulling of the commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof. For the law made nothing perfect, but the bringing in of a better hope did; by which we draw nigh unto God…By so much was Jesus made a surety of a better testament" (Heb.7:18,19,22).
Dispensationalists who reject the new covenant promise with their man-made religion are enemies of the cross. With their different gospel for every day of the week. With their worship of the flesh and rejection of the truth and Spirit. They literalize every verse of scripture and turn the Holy Spirit himself into a Jewish only god. They are now reaping the lies that were sown 150 years ago by their false prophet John Darby.
Yes, they will indeed judge the Twelve Tribes. To which tribe do you belong?
What part of the following is simply not clear to you and your pals, that you are forever measuring others by what is obviously your own standard of acceptance?
Romans 5:7 For scarcely for a righteous man will one die: yet peradventure for a good man some would even dare to die. 5:8 But God commendeth his love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us.
WHILE we were YET sinners.
NOT when we finally measured up to Musti's and his pals so crystal clear obviously ignorant - performance based - measure of acceptance.
Geez, get a clue, already.