The time correlation is clear.
Correlation DOES NOT equal causation.
The time correlation is clear.
Of course not.Correlation DOES NOT equal causation.
Well no they didn't. They were "proven to work" in drastically modified versions of what is usually accepted as a controlled clinical trial.The vaccine was proven- statistically- to work in controlled clinical trials.
Says some guy on an internet forum.Well no they didn't. They were "proven to work" in drastically modified versions of what is usually accepted as a controlled clinical trial.
The numbers are out there. You have blinders on.It's very easy to make unproven claims.
All plagues end eventually. If enough people get sick they become immune. But at the price of a lot of illness and death. Apparently that is what you advocate.The Spanish Flu receded without a vaccine. Do you think that it was unique?
Your childishness is sad.All plagues end eventually. If enough people get sick they become immune. But at the price of a lot of illness and death. Apparently that is what you advocate.
I advocate that people who are at risk be careful and that healthy people go about their business.Plagues can also end from 'natural' social distancing. Either people are so scared that they don't go out, or so many die that the population is less dense. Are you suggesting this route?
Thank you for your input.Your childishness is sad.
I advocate that people who are at risk be careful and that healthy people go about their business.
Some sickness and death. “A lot” is still in question, due to some sleight of numbers, and relative.All plagues end eventually. If enough people get sick they become immune. But at the price of a lot of illness and death. Apparently that is what you advocate.
Plagues can also end from 'natural' social distancing. Either people are so scared that they don't go out, or so many die that the population is less dense. Are you suggesting this route?
We were discussing plagues in general.Some sickness and death. “A lot” is still in question, due to some sleight of numbers, and relative.
It's hard to tell listening to the hysterical media.COVID, fortunately, is not as lethal as those.
To pretend that it isn't dangerous at all is as bad as pretending it's as bad as the Spanish Flu.It's hard to tell listening to the hysterical media.
The shutdown was more harmful.To pretend that it isn't dangerous at all is as bad as pretending it's as bad as the Spanish Flu.
You have no way to know that. How much damage would there have been without a shutdown?The shutdown was more harmful.
How convenient for your position.You have no way to know that.
You have no way to know that.How much damage would there have been without a shutdown?
We cannot do a comparison between having done a shutdown and not doing one. Not in the same place and time. But tell me please, what is the logic behind the shutdown? Why would anybody think it would help?How convenient for your position.
You have no way to know that.
Then quit claiming that "the lockdowns were better than no lockdowns".We cannot do a comparison between having done a shutdown and not doing one. Not in the same place and time.
It's a tremendously lopsided view to think that life destroying lockdowns were a better option than the obviously more sensible approach of protecting the vulnerable and letting everyone else live their lives.But tell me please, what is the logic behind the shutdown? Why would anybody think it would help?
Ah- that sounds reasonable. Who are the vulnerable? How many of them are there?Then quit claiming that "the lockdowns were better than no lockdowns".
It's a tremendously lopsided view to think that life destroying lockdowns were a better option than the obviously more sensible approach of protecting the vulnerable and letting everyone else live their lives.
You're really do need your hand held at every moment, don't you?Ah- that sounds reasonable. Who are the vulnerable? How many of them are there?