ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
In looking back at my resources, I see that I was mixing data from global estimates and US estimates.Should have qualified that you picked a number out of a hat.
But thanks for helping
In looking back at my resources, I see that I was mixing data from global estimates and US estimates.Should have qualified that you picked a number out of a hat.
In looking back at my resources,
Needy today, eh?
God's truth according to scripture utterly condemns Roman Catholicism's Popery.
Statiscs are totally irrelevant. The fact that billions are caught up in Roman Catholic Popery only means that
it is a popular widespread deception. Regardless of how many church fathers or theologians past, present or future invent arguments to
support the Roman Catholic Popery .
I'm sure there are many in the Body who are still snared in the lies of Catholicism just as there are many still snared in the lies of Islam.The most consistent thing about Christianity are the legions of Christians telling other Christians they aren't saved.
The most consistent thing about true Christianity is that Christians trust and depend on Christ NOT men.The most consistent thing about Christianity are the legions of Christians telling other Christians they aren't saved.
There are many snared in lies about Catholicism, but I can't see any actual lies of Catholicism. Cite? Or not. Either way, peace to you.I'm sure there are many in the Body who are still snared in the lies of Catholicism just as there are many still snared in the lies of Islam.
If you can't see "any actual lies of Catholicism", you are not looking. The lies are a multitude. Try the "ascension of Mary" for one. But there are many that are far, far more serious than that.There are many snared in lies about Catholicism, but I can't see any actual lies of Catholicism. Cite? Or not. Either way, peace to you.
Their support of immigration is unamerican. ?If you can't see "any actual lies of Catholicism", you are not looking. The lies are a multitude. Try the "ascension of Mary" for one. But there are many that are far, far more serious than that.
Their support of immigration is unamerican. ?
Yes and rightly so.The most consistent thing about Christianity are the legions of Christians telling other Christians they aren't saved.
Bluster.If you can't see "any actual lies of Catholicism", you are not looking.
Give me some evidence inconsistent with the assumption of the Blessed Virgin. (Only the Lord ascends.)The lies are a multitude. Try the "ascension of Mary" for one.
Doubt.But there are many that are far, far more serious than that.
Non-existent, as demonstrated by Vatican City immigration statsCatholic support of immigrants is ...
Is something I've never seen... evangelical hatred of immigrants.
Yes and rightly so.
Jude says, 'I had to write and urge you to contend for the faith that was once for all entrusted to the saints (Jude 3)
Paul says''test everything...'(1Thess5:21)
The Pope declares that whoever disagrees with their edicts is anathema(?)
I'm reminded that Paul uses anathema too. In the Catholic Church it meant excommunication, an extra-extra excommunication with lots of ceremony, it was rarely used and is no longer in Canon law at all. There still is such a thing as excommunication but truth be told, no one talks about it or cares about it and we rarely hear about it happening. Catholicism, the way I grew up in it, is more sacramental and less Bible studying, we don't dive into the Bible the way you do. The Mass and the sacraments are the center of Catholic life, and while there are readings from old and new testament at every Mass, the focus is on the consecration. It's true, average Catholics don't study the Bible to a great extent although there are usually Bible studies in every parish so it does happen, but I'm not going to argue that there isn't a huge difference in the way you read the Bible and the way Catholics read the Bible.
But back to your comment, the pope doesn't just say something and we say "Yay Pope!" or we're anathema.
Your spot on about the big difference we read the a Bible. I place authority in what the Bible says not what the church says.I'm reminded that Paul uses anathema too. In the Catholic Church it meant excommunication, an extra-extra excommunication with lots of ceremony, it was rarely used and is no longer in Canon law at all. There still is such a thing as excommunication but truth be told, no one talks about it or cares about it and we rarely hear about it happening. Catholicism, the way I grew up in it, is more sacramental and less Bible studying, we don't dive into the Bible the way you do. The Mass and the sacraments are the center of Catholic life, and while there are readings from old and new testament at every Mass, the focus is on the consecration. It's true, average Catholics don't study the Bible to a great extent although there are usually Bible studies in every parish so it does happen, but I'm not going to argue that there isn't a huge difference in the way you read the Bible and the way Catholics read the Bible.
But back to your comment, the pope doesn't just say something and we say "Yay Pope!" or we're anathema.
First, there is no evidence.Give me some evidence inconsistent with the assumption of the Blessed Virgin. (Only the Lord ascends.)
Your spot on about the big difference we read the a Bible. I place authority in what the Bible says not what the church says.
Do you think that they were being intentionally ironic by using the term "assumption"?Give me some evidence inconsistent with the assumption of the Blessed Virgin. (Only the Lord ascends.)