Reading your doctrine INTO scripture is called "Eisegesis". Deriving doctrine OUT OF scripture is called "Exegesis". Exegesis is proper hermeneutics. Eisegesis is not.
Get out Romans 5 and read this (I'm using ESV):
Sin came into the through one man, and death through sin, and so death spread to all because all sinned...the judgment following one trespass brought condemnation...because of one man's trespass, death reigned.. But just as one tresspass led to condemnation (Paul is talking about death), one act of righteousness (Christ's) leads to justification and life for all men...so that, as sin reigned in death, grace also might reign through righteousness leading to eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.
IF you read the words and get a doctrine from the words of the Bible (exegesis, proper hermeneutics) you get that death is the result of sin and eternal life is the result of Jesus Christ's obedience.
If you start with your doctrine and redefine the words to fit your doctrine (eisegesis, improper hermeneutics), you "know" that the condemnation is eternal torment in hell, so when this chapter talks about death, death doesn't mean death, and Paul's point is destroyed.
Just read the Bible and accept what it says, rather than the tradition of men.
They said to Columbus, "There is a reason your view that the world is round is not the historical view that has been held for 2000 years, yes some hold to your heresy, but they are wrong because they believe that the world is not flat like we do."