Yes it is...
"The ocean is a desert with it's life underground...
And a perfect disguise above."
America, 1971
/Thread
Is the Desert just another Ocean?
- Thread starter Skeeter
- Start date
"The ocean is a desert with it's life underground...
And a perfect disguise above."
America, 1971
/Thread
I'm glad you enjoyed the quip...But the selfie is unnecessary.
I enjoy your posts. But, to clarify, that was a pic of TomO. A Tom shaped like an O.I'm glad you enjoyed the quip...But the selfie is unnecessary.
How? A smaller population with no resistance leads to slower proliferation and possibly herd immunity.
Last edited:
So, you become nonresponsive when your view is criticized?
Do you really teach English?You were being critical?
Yeah. Don't tell anyone.
I know Taiwanese four-year-olds who make more sense than you.
Right Divider
Body part
The fossil record indicates that there was a great global catastrophic event that buried vast numbers of plants and animals worldwide.
Coded information (that's what DNA is) does not occur naturally. It always has an intelligent source.
In what way?... they all "evolve" to be the same thing just a little different.
Natural SELECTION only SELECTS that which ALREADY EXISTS.
Everything occurs "over time".
Oh the irony.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
The defining feature of science is reproducibility. When evolutionists can reproduce what they claim has happened in nature, they can be considered REAL scientists. Until then they're just telling fairy tales.
And that's the opinion of a REAL scientist.
Experimental results should be reproducible. We do not have to and cannot reproduce the Big Bang or abiogenesis or macroevolution. We do not have to reproduce phenomena to be secure that they exist.The defining feature of science is reproducibility. When evolutionists can reproduce what they claim has happened in nature, they can be considered REAL scientists. Until then they're just telling fairy tales.
And that's the opinion of a REAL scientist.
ok doser
lifeguard at the cement pond
That's pretty much what I said
The what?
Why do you think that we CANNOT reproduce abiogenesis as proposed by evolutionists?
Why do you think that we CANNOT reproduce macro-evolution as proposed by evolutionists?
You do if you're doing REAL science.
Right Divider
Body part
Experimental results MUST be reproducible.
Because they never happened.
That you "feel secure" is not proof of anything.
I think you have difficulty with complex sentence structure. Grade school level work is an appropriate focus for you.
I'd rather have a Christian Theonomy (constitutional monarchy) than a democracy. Theocracy will come later when Christ returns.
I do not see how this is better than hoping for Sharia Law. Separation of church and state is the reason this democracy has lasted as long as it has.
Last edited: