Is it HUMANLY possible for someone to be that ignorant, and still be
able to hold a logical discussion?
able to hold a logical discussion?
Some members are so obsessed with "meshak" and GM is the very first one.
I am so flattered.
Is it HUMANLY possible for someone to be that ignorant, and still be
able to hold a logical discussion?
Your interpretation of 'sinner' is not sufficient proof.
Without having to resort to trick questions, prove that I was not saved in that moment of belief.
Seriously, consider the source. Chrys intentionally misrepresents the majority of users on TOL over simple disagreements. You are not a man or Catholic. Everything bad that happens on planet earth is your fault.
Seems everyone's an expert on everyone else's salvation status. It's getting old.
She doesn't accept the book of Acts,
because it was written by Paul!
I understand your complaint. However, there is only one basis on which to discern (not judge) another's salvation: If someone does not believe, much less knowingly rejects, the Gospel of the grace of God in favor of a gospel they won't even explain in any detail except "follow Jesus" (at best, a version of the false "moral example" theory), then that person is not a Christian in the only sense that counts -- of being in Christ. Meaning all religious profession aside, they are outside of Christ, meaning still in Adam, meaning still an enemy of God. That's what the Word says. And that is who Meshak is.
Pointing that out is not judging, for no judging of that person is really even necessary. Their own confession is what judges them, lest they repent unto Christ.
I understand your complaint. However, there is only one basis on which to discern (not judge) another's salvation: If someone does not believe, much less knowingly rejects, the Gospel of the grace of God in favor of a gospel they won't even explain in any detail except "follow Jesus" (at best, a version of the false "moral example" theory), then that person is not a Christian in the only sense that counts -- of being in Christ. Meaning all religious profession aside, they are outside of Christ, meaning still in Adam, meaning still an enemy of God. That's what the Word says. And that is who Meshak is.
Pointing that out is not judging, for no judging of that person is really even necessary. Their own confession is what judges them, lest they repent unto Christ.
I understand your complaint. However, there is only one basis on which to discern (not judge) another's salvation: If someone does not believe, much less knowingly rejects, the Gospel of the grace of God in favor of a gospel they won't even explain in any detail except "follow Jesus" (at best, a version of the false "moral example" theory), then that person is not a Christian in the only sense that counts -- of being in Christ. Meaning all religious profession aside, they are outside of Christ, meaning still in Adam, meaning still an enemy of God. That's what the Word says. And that is who Meshak is.
Pointing that out is not judging, for no judging of that person is really even necessary. Their own confession is what judges them, lest they repent unto Christ.
Musterion,
Have you entered the new covenant?
LA