Because I am a simple man, and believe that scripture should be made plain (simple), I'll give a simple answer, and that is yes.
MAD is partly correct when they note the transition in the what the Gentiles are required to do vs the Jews at the beginning of the book of Acts compared to the end. However, that is a process, not an event, and it had more to do with the prejudices of the Jewish believers than anything. Peter wouldn't eat with Gentiles at the start of the book, but God took that part of the law away from him before Paul was preaching to the Gentiles. God gradually took the Jews into His perfect plan, one event at the time. By the end of the book of Acts, around the time Peter is writing his epistle, Paul is still baptizing people, and Peter is opening his second epistle talking about Saving Faith through the righteousness of God.
The danger of MAD is that it destroys parts of the teachings of Jesus that we are still required to obey.
There were hundreds of thousands of conversions in Acts, but only 4 or 5 are really given in detail. They are
1. Jews (Acts 2)