Yes, I believe He can be both. If God does something we don't consider moral then we can be sure we can only see through a glass darkly. I think we see this a lot...when people say God would never do thus and so or He would never allow thus and so. We can't see His purposes and His ways which are so much higher than ours.
So, it certainly wouldn't make God evil. I guess it would have to (change) broaden our definition of righteous. Since those are the only two choices you've given me.
I'm not sure that you understood my question.
I'm not talking about the things that God does that maybe we can't understand because of a lack of perspective or knowledge. I'm asking a PURELY hypothetical question that is philosophical in nature. I'm asking what if God where to do something that we obviously know the real God would never actually do, something completely and absurdly evil like appear in physical form and sexually assault all the five year old kids in Los Angeles at once.
Would such an action make God an evil god or would it merely alter the definition of the words 'good' and 'evil'?
My answer is the former, not the later. God is objectively good and if He were to do evil, He would be evil. Having said that, you are not wrong when you say that He is the standard of morality but perhaps not in the sense in which you mean it. My goal here is to present a rationally coherent Christian ethic and code of morality as well as to show that what passes in most Christian's minds as a moral standard renders God amoral and unwittingly hands a victory to atheists.
Resting in Him,
Clete
Last edited: