Bain,
Girls raped by men often will find attraction to females.
God created the act of love thru physical intercourse and there is nothing sinful about that.
When it is prostituted by sex outside of the marriage covenant it becomes lust.
Many children are at this moment being raped and tortured by evil people of reprobate minds just like your mind.
You may not be a homo or a rapist but you have the mind of one in that you think it is nature's dispensation to have sexual desires outside of God's design and you will be punished for promoting a lie to people who need forgiveness.
You are headed to judgment at neck breaking speed and don't even realize it. Wake up dude. Quit kissing the gays arse.
Sorry, I agree with you there but are you getting from my posts that I'm excusing homosexuality, or anything else?
God condemns homosexuality, in all contexts, as a chosen behavior, just like choosing to steal, choosing to lie, or choosing to seduce another man's wife. Hence the condemnation as sin, and it's perfectly just.
If it was "normal" in the sense many here insist -- that "He made me this way" -- then He'd be an unjust hypocrite for condemning it.
No, i quoted you because i was expanding on what you had already said and wanted you to have credit for your post too, i know you don't excuse it.
That can mean a lot of things. Please explain what all happened, if you will.
Who hasn't masturbated at some point? I'd wager it's practically nobody...
The rest is just yet more unsubstantiated rhetoric.
At 17 I prayed, asked God into my life and repented of anything in my life that could be construed as sin. I started going to a church that I subsequently left through complete disillusionment along with 'organized religion' and 'traditional dogma' in general. Short version...
:hand raises: I have. I have had more women in a month then most have in their lifetime.
That is a scar that I carry with regret that I could have been a loving man. Yet life goes on Bain.
The women I knew that had been molested and abused were attracted to me cause I was once extremely attractive. Many of them wanted physical relationships with other women because sex to them was just a choice and was unfulfilling and empty. Poor things. What a fool I was as a young man.
The word sex does not appear in scripture.
Only Love and the love act in marriage. If you think you are being satisfied by sex Bain, you are not.
I teach love education to kids and not sex education. There is no such thing as sex education. Only fear, sadness and empty lives and using of others to gratify self. What in the hell is this baby raping going on in the news?
If anyone reads this and is thinking about child rape, take a tip from the pigs that had the demons cast into them when Messiah cast Legion out of the demoniac, they immediately committed suicide - kill yourselves before acting out on innocent children.
What were you told you must do to be saved? Or is that it? Be specific, please.
Barbarian regarding Musty's admission of a passing interest in homosexual activity;
You do realize that is completely alien to the vast majority of straight people, right? I, in my most rebellious years, could never even visualize doing that kind of thing. It wasn't sickening, it was kind of like "how would you like to dedicate your life to accounting?" No interest at all.
No, I've never been one of the "my sin is nicer than your sin" crowd. I'm a sinner too. Just other kinds of sin. Not looking down on you for that.
In the sense that a burglar is proud that he never was never an embezzler. The point isn't that other people are better than you; it's that homosexuality isn't attractive at all to most of us, even if it is attractive to a small number of other people. There's nothing sinful in having an attraction to sin; we all do. In fact, there's much to commend in those who are inclined to some sort of sin, and avoid it.
You've confused being human with being a sinner.
No, i quoted you because i was expanding on what you had already said and wanted you to have credit for your post too, i know you don't excuse it.
This is what my post was expanding on :
Not the way it came across. Still isn't.
Not the way it came across.
Stop digging. It's still pride. It's still fleshly. It's still comparing oneself with others: "I may be bad but I ain't as bad as that guy over there."
Nor is it attractive to me. It wasn't even attractive enough back then to have acted on it
The most morally upright human is still a lost sinner without Christ. No exceptions.
Prove it. What part of that little checklist is in error? Apart from the fact that you've already green-checked at least one of the last two points, I mean.
and leave it at that but you wouldn't get the irony.Answer my question first.
The viewpoint in question is whether or not catering a celebration of sin is condoning said sin. Some people believe it is and thus they should not be forced to do so, rather they should be free to decline to do so.And you can have that viewpoint. There are people that have the viewpoint that people of certain races shouldn't be provided with certain commodities. Civil society has to balance the interests of both types of people. But if you let the providers call all the shots then you end up with what we had before civil rights, people can't get hotels, eat at lunch counters etc.
You're an idiot if you think such freedom for all people would lead to the virtual enslavement of others. When all are free to discriminate then no one is forced to do anything.Freedom for one group becomes enslavement for another. Now you probably think that's a just fine outcome for homosexuals, but the majority of society doesn't agree with you.
So the subcontractor is the one in question. If one has a license to sell Coco-Cola and then sells it at an event Coca-Cola Co. has no knowledge of the topic of the event, etc.Coke, ultimately, a subcontractor proximally.
If the product is being sold then the person selling is not protesting the event. That much is obvious.Is that what you think the only options are? Protest or support? :doh:
I wasn't sure if you meant a friend brought the pizzas.uhh people who bake pizza? What are you trying to ask?
Why do the queers convictions have to be religious?only a very dim witted person would think what you present is even remotely like the original. If you want that sort of comparison then you need to have a heterosexual couple going to a gay baker to purchase a wedding cake and being refused because of the gay bakers religious convictions and the simple fact he doesn't wish to "celebrate" that couple's marriage.
Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding!If you really want to go that route then YOU have to find this acceptable -
Either a bussiness has the freedom to deny services based on personal conviction or they don't. No special treatment for anyone.
You mean among he animals that will hump anything? Animals will hump legs, their own siblings, a log, etc. Whatever gets them off when they want to get off. Are you suggesting humans should be free to do the same?homosexuality exists in nature.
You mean among he animals that will hump anything? Animals will hump legs, their own siblings, a log, etc. Whatever gets them off when they want to get off. Are you suggesting humans should be free to do the same?
Leftists like Traci despise personal freedom of conscience when it disagrees with his choices, but also despise allowing the market to balance out this situation to everyone's eventual satisfaction: some businesses not catering to homosexual ritual without sanction or penalty, while others sweep in to scoop up that profit, advertising that they're more than happy to put two Ken dolls on a cake while accepting competitor's coupons.
Which proves the eternal fact about all leftists: whatever else they say motivates them, their #1 motive is always control.
Then what did you mean when you said it exists in nature?no and what a stupid thing to say.
Actually I'm not the one who called it "unnatural" in this thread. Try again.You made the stupid and false claim that homosexuality is unnatural even though it exists in nature. It's natural, deal with it.
no it occurs in nature thus it is natural. you don't get to change the meaning of natural or exclude natural things from nature just because you want to justify your unnatural prejudices. That's just dishonest your claim is not only false but you know it is false.
and yet more dishonesty.