I was reading a male meterologist is suing a network because he isn't young, female, and attractive. And was passed over.
At least 10 people were killed and 39 others wounded during a bloody weekend in Chicago, police said.
Among the dead is a 6-year-old girl.
story
These killings are unrelated. What is going on in Chicago? Is more gun control needed? Obviously people have guns who have no business possessing them.
What would help prevent random gun violence?
Eric Holder suggested brainwashing in 1996. :idunno:
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/03/18/Holder-Fight-Guns-Like-Cigarettes
Maybe not the best phrase to use but I must say, I agree with Holder. The perception of guns among the youth must change.
At least 10 people were killed and 39 others wounded during a bloody weekend in Chicago, police said.
Among the dead is a 6-year-old girl.
story
These killings are unrelated. What is going on in Chicago? Is more gun control needed? Obviously people have guns who have no business possessing them.
What would help prevent random gun violence?
What youth in particular, what's the perception that needs to be changed, and how would such a change affect the millions of law-abiding youthful gun owners?
Illegal gun use should be prosecuted swiftly, forcefully and severely.
Illegal possession of a firearm? Twenty years - no plea bargaining, no nothing. Twenty years.
Commision of a crime with an illegal firearm? Death penalty.
- All youth, but inner city youth specifically.
- change the perception that guns are cool
- He was talking about changing perception, not law. Maybe the law-abiding youth also wouldn't think that guns are really cool anymore :idunno:
He was talking about changing perception, not law.
That is some pretty liberal gun control. Illegal possession could be a permit lapse or other minor error. Twenty years? Some democrats would love you!
Wow, police brutality! Unnecessary use of force. You know what they call that here?
Tuesday. lain:
On a more serious note, It's hard to know without more details, but it sounds like the police had probable cause to question him, and when he resisted they were probably just following protocol in using non-lethal means to subdue him. Mostly non-lethal, I should probably say...
:liberals:Are you making a blanket statement that guns aren't cool?
Did I? Let me know if I did....
change the perception that guns are cool
- Maybe the law-abiding youth also wouldn't think that guns are really cool anymore
I would be attempting to convince them that their actions or behavior weren't cool, not that guns weren't cool. You can't take the cool out of guns. You can change destructive behavior, though. But not through the kind of gun control Holder would likely espouse. Do you see the point I'm making?If someone wanted to attempt to convince inner city youth that guns are not "cool", would you support or oppose their efforts?
Of course, or we wouldn't be having this conversation.I'm curious, did Holder say anying that you disagree with?
The problem is, inner city youth culture doesn't think "law abiding" is cool.
It appears you did here:
I would be attempting to convince them that their actions or behavior weren't cool, not that guns weren't cool. You can't take the cool out of guns. You can change destructive behavior, though. But not through the kind of gun control Holder would
likely espouse. Do you see the point I'm making?
Of course, or we wouldn't be having this conversation.
He wants to make it "not cool to carry a gun anymore."
He wants to "change the way people think about guns."
Too vague for me to agree with but in context of the entire video, I have no problem with the statement.That it's "wrong to carry a gun."
He wants the anti-gun message in school every day at every level
And to "brainwash people into thinking about guns in a vastly different way."
Note there is no differentiation between the illegal carrying of a gun, and the use of it in commission of a crime.
There's no recognition of lawful, responsible gun ownership.
Of the existing right of a citizen to carry a gun under existing legal parameters, which is not "wrong."
He references "people." That's a lot larger group than students, or minors, or gang members, etc.