6days
New member
Fortunately historians and librarians and others don't agree with you.I think not. 'If any part of a manuscript has been altered then you must find the whole manuscript as untrue .
Fortunately historians and librarians and others don't agree with you.I think not. 'If any part of a manuscript has been altered then you must find the whole manuscript as untrue .
A translation is never perfect. Modern translations are reliable, due to the number of linguistic scholars... and the number of various translations. Most study Bibles have good foot notes explaining any possible doubt about the text. It's often a good idea to compare several translations if you question any particular passage. Any of the top 20 or so modern translations are all good,If the present day version of the Bible is accurate and true there would be no need for textual criticism . The Bible was translated from Hebrew ,Greek , and Aramaic manuscripts to Latin, now you think that the Latin version is a true instance of the three....?
Yes I have but it has been decades ago , but thank you , it looks like a good read.Have you read anything about this other than the casual google search?
If not, I recommend:
https://www.amazon.com/Text-New-Tes...ords=Text+of+the+New+Testament+second+edition
Nontrinitarianism (or antitrinitarianism) refers to Christian belief systems that reject the doctrine of the Trinity as found in the Nicene Creed as not having a scriptural origin. Nontrinitarian views differ widely on the nature of God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit.Fortunately historians and librarians and others don't agree with you.
That doesn't really have anything to do with textual criticism, since that is a belief based on the entirety of Scripture. Throughout both OT and NT we see that Jesus is God. Jesus has every attribute that God the Father does. Here just a few of the many verses...Nontrinitarianism (or antitrinitarianism) refers to Christian belief systems that reject the doctrine of the Trinity as found in the Nicene Creed as not having a scriptural origin. Nontrinitarian views differ widely on the nature of God, Jesus, and the Holy Spirit.
If Constantine had the power to take books out of the Bible, than he also had power to alter or change text that is in the Bible. Anything that Man has put his hands own will be changed forever !
How?The Dead Sea Scrolls verify the Old Testament canon.
As well, there are many extra-canonical texts that
contain valuable information (and they are available).
Don't underestimate the ability of God to protect the Bible.
No, I am not saying that.So , are you saying that the King James Bible (most commonly read bible) is complete and unaltered especially the New Testament since it day of conception ?
Trinity doctrine: Less than 300 years after the Bible was completed, a Trinitarian writer added to 1 John 5:7 the words “in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” That statement did not appear in the original text. “From the sixth century onwards,” notes Bible scholar Bruce Metzger, those words were “found more and more frequently in manuscripts of the Old Latin and of the [Latin] Vulgate.”No, I am not saying that.
Are you saying that?
As mentioned before.... The belief Jesus is God (and the Holy Spirit) is not based on one verse but on ALL scripture.Trinity doctrine: Less than 300 years after the Bible was completed, a Trinitarian writer added to 1 John 5:7 the words “in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.” That statement did not appear in the original text. “From the sixth century onwards,” notes Bible scholar Bruce Metzger, those words were “found more and more frequently in manuscripts of the Old Latin and of the [Latin] Vulgate.”
The belief Jesus is God (and the Holy Spirit) is not based on one verse but on 0.3% of the Old Testament, 4% of the Gospels, and 7% of the rest of the New Testament.As mentioned before.... The belief Jesus is God (and the Holy Spirit) is not based on one verse but on ALL scripture.
are you trying to tell me that the word Trinity is not in every verse of the Bible? Haha where oh where did you come up with your statistics?The belief Jesus is God (and the Holy Spirit) is not based on one verse but on 0.3% of the Old Testament, 4% of the Gospels, and 7% of the rest of the New Testament.
It is definitely not based on ALL scripture.
I think it's worth considering that the four gospels he chose weren't the four most reliable. Men chose four out of tens of gospels. They could easily have erredHmmm, so what are you suggesting?
Is there a modern translation which is reliable or do you not believe so?
Please do not say the NWT. :chuckle:
If Constantine had the power to take books out of the Bible, than he also had power to alter or change text that is in the Bible. Anything that Man has put his hands own will be changed forever !
Sent from my SM-J727P using Tapatalk
Hmmm, so what are you suggesting?
Is there a modern translation which is reliable or do you not believe so?
Please do not say the NWT. :chuckle:
I haven't found the word Trinity in any verse of the Bible, have you?are you trying to tell me that the word Trinity is not in every verse of the Bible?
It is a rough estimate of the number of verses used by Trinitarians to justify their beliefs.Haha where oh where did you come up with your statistics?
not the word..... but certainly evidence of one God in 3 persons throughout Scripture.I haven't found the word Trinity in any verse of the Bible, have you?
not the word..... but certainly evidence of one God in 3 persons throughout Scripture.
You are mistaken.not the word..... but certainly evidence of one God in 3 persons throughout Scripture.
No he's not , Here you are , a good God fearing man willing to probably die for what you believe in , and all the time what you believe in , is partly base on a lie . "Man" made up the word TRINITY ( Roman Catholic Church) !You are mistaken.