The bible speaks of the creation days as epochs of time, not literal days.
Is that why the seventh day is an epoch of time?
The bible speaks of the creation days as epochs of time, not literal days.
Is that why the seventh day is an epoch of time?
I looked at the original text and it did not say: (The following or next) evening and morning was a day. Nor is the word "that" in the scriptures, being (that day.) I see no reason to retract what I said, day being a epoch of time; even though the words "evening" and "morning" is used.According to the Bible, what is listed as the time duration for a day. This is on the first page if you are not sure.
According to the Bible, what is listed as the time duration for a day. This is on the first page if you are not sure.
There is a place in scriptures that says the seventh thousandth year is the seventh day. (Hebrew time)
Do explain
Let's say you read Genesis 1 and you think, after reading it, perhaps for the first time, "Is one day in Genesis 1, one day? Or is it some other unit of time?" and you think, "Boy, it sure would be nice, me being Protestant, if the Bible itself, infallibly referred to the creation account, and sheds some light on my question," and you know what? Exodus.I looked at the original text and it did not say: (The following or next) evening and morning was a day. Nor is the word "that" in the scriptures, being (that day.) I see no reason to retract what I said, day being a epoch of time; even though the words "evening" and "morning" is used.
Thanks anyway for pointing that out to me.
My thought is that if people have been here for that long we'd be buried in books. People have been around for thousands of centuries, and we only figured out how to write things down in the past handful of millennia? That's doesn't pass my sniff test.If people were on this planet for millions of years the bones would be piled up a 100 feet high on every square inch of every continent! Evolution is a lie of the devil who hates humans with such a passion that he will create a religion that is taught in every school and in every country. Evolution is a religion not science. The professors and teachers of it are really priests of the devil who's job is to deceive because they themselves are deceived. You have to have blind faith to believe that one animal can turn into another animal which has never been witnessed one single time ever.
That's interesting. What scripture?There is a place in scriptures that says the seventh thousandth year is the seventh day. (Hebrew time)
Let's say you read Genesis 1 and you think, after reading it, perhaps for the first time, "Is one day in Genesis 1, one day? Or is it some other unit of time?" and you think, "Boy, it sure would be nice, me being Protestant, if the Bible itself, infallibly referred to the creation account, and sheds some light on my question," and you know what? Exodus.
There's no indication in Exodus that Genesis 1 days are anything other than regular day-days. Not millennium-days or epoch-days or whatever else; Exodus just says days. Moses didn't get into any of this stuff, there isn't even any explanation afterwards or beforehand---just "six days."
You can think what you want. There's an element that goes to great lengths to show how scripturally faithful they are, and this is a bear trap for them. If they're so diehard Sola Scriptura, then they have to pass this test, or else they're liars, and they only believe what they want to about the Bible; they're fakes. And their ankle gets stuck.No explanation, but there is a 'crack' that could allow other time. But it will still not be enjoyed by the uniformitarian because it means that other celestial things (battles?) were going on. If you want details, let me know. It's about the Hebrews expressions in v2 and about how Moses organized sections as he wrote.
That's interesting also. Hebrews reads like Christians have already entered into an everlasting day of rest, in this body, and on this earth, now.There is a place in scripture that says we may work six days but the seventh day is a day of rest.
I looked at the original text and it did not say: (The following or next) evening and morning was a day. Nor is the word "that" in the scriptures, being (that day.) I see no reason to retract what I said, day being a epoch of time; even though the words "evening" and "morning" is used.
Thanks anyway for pointing that out to me.
Do you mean 6000 since Noah's cataclysm and about 1700 before that? Interesting (because of 1700 from creation to cataclysm in Genesis and Mayan records), but not satisfactory about Niagara, Missoula, Morse and ice cores.
It was roughly 2000 years from creation to Abraham, 2000 years from him to Christ and 2000 years since.
There is more assumption in there than you think. The Bible scholars, the real ones, not here, usually say about 6000-10,000 years.
I mean 7700 because it fits some dating models.
That's interesting also. Hebrews reads like Christians have already entered into an everlasting day of rest, in this body, and on this earth, now.
There is more assumption in there than you think. The Bible scholars, the real ones, not here, usually say about 6000-10,000 years.
The weekly Sabbath foreshadows the millennial Sabbath.
People who reject the one automatically reject the other.
Jesus said he is Lord of the Sabbath. And he will be.