Idolater
"Matthew 16:18-19" Dispensationalist (Catholic) χρ
Yes. It's my main contention against both MAD and Calvinism, they are ethically void, and it's because of their own individual soteriologies yes but mainly just because their ethics is different, and that because their interpretation of the Apostles' place in the development and operation of the One Holy Catholic & Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ the Lord from heaven ("You are seated at the right hand of the Father, have mercy on us").Those who believe Christians are made incapable of sin at conversion make the bulk of the Bible unnecessary for them after they get saved. Consider the sinless Christian's interpretation of the following verses from 2 Timothy 3:
15 And that from a child thou hast known the holy scriptures, which are able to make thee wise unto salvation through faith which is in Christ Jesus.
16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:
17 That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.
A sinless Christian would have to assume verses given to all men for reproof, for correction, and for instruction are not for the reproof of Christians who are sinless and therefore have no need for reproof or correction but are given to Christians to reprove lost people. I do not accept that twisted interpretation.
That they're ethically empty implies exactly what you say here, "[MAD or Calvinism ethics, e.g.] make the bulk of the Bible unnecessary for them after they get saved," and MADs and Calvinists will think that, "verses given to all men for reproof, for correction, and for instruction are not for the reproof of Christians."
Yes.