You be pretty hilarious, barby.
You think I'm scathed?The tutu wearing short guy thinks he can talk about people and they need to let him off unscathed.
I already knew you were angry. That's all those words reduce to. So you reach for the gay business because it was the last thing you saw get a rise out of me. Silly business though.What a coward. What a clown. What a fool. What a bully.
See, it isn't that the gay bit irked me. What irked me was that you do it even though it's a pretty clear violation of the agreement you decided not to honor. And that's the one thing I can't get around, the thing you mistook for something else. That's what was at the heart of the gay bit, not the sexuality. You didn't understand that because you sell yours too cheaply to your anger.And those slippers........ pink satan, are they?
Meh........ a very poor fit where I live.As you read the following see how many of the institutions of government mentioned are ideas that you support. The more of them you support, the more marxist you are in your political ideas. The way I see things, we are already a marxist state, we, meaning most of the US public, just doesn't realize it. It seems that most marxists here don't even realize they are marxist.
Nah........ not where I live.1. Abolition of private property and the application of all rents of land to public purposes.
Yep...... This makes sense, but where I live if folks don't like it they can always clear off.2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
Nah...... won't ever happen where I live.3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
Rebels, as in criminals? Yep! Our Police are now authorised to seize any money in excess of £1000 that a person is in possession of in a public place who cannot explain the reason for having it. If you've got ten grand on you and can explain why then, 'no probs'.4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
Yep........ we've got our National Bank which sets credit rates etc.5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
Our government has just seized control of the entire North Eastern rail system from Virgin 'cos it was a mess and not working properly. Fair enough....... if folks cannot get service out of something then somebody should do something about it.6. Centralization of the means of communications and transportation in the hands of the State.
Nope....... our gov funds commerce and industry, and seeks to utilise waste land, which makes great sense, but otherwise we don't fit this description.7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state, the bringing into cultivation of waste lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
Nah...... we don't focus on the above description, but we'd love an upsurge in commerce, industry, building, travel and retail 'cos our system would benefit massively from that.8. Equal liability of all to labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
We have been attempting to distribute commerce and industry more widely for some decades now, because rural areas benefit from the increase in jobs etc. Makes senmse.9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries, gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country, by a more equitable distribution of population over the country.
Absolutely! Free education and medical care for all minors. Yep!10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children's factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production.
I won't bother, but thanks anyway.You can read the rest of this article at: http://www.libertyzone.com/Communist-Manifesto-Planks.html
You think I'm scathed?I've never really understood why anyone would be upset about someone who dislikes them having a low opinion of them. That's never been my side of this conversation. That's why I could pos rep my stalker now and again when he found something that was funny or insightful.
I already knew you were angry. That's all those words reduce to.
So you reach for the gay business because it was the last thing you saw get a rise out of me. Silly business though.
See, it isn't that the gay bit irked me. What irked me was that you do it even though it's a pretty clear violation of the agreement you decided not to honor. And that's the one thing I can't get around, the thing you mistook for something else. That's what was at the heart of the gay bit, not the sexuality. You didn't understand that because you sell yours too cheaply to your anger.
You've never really understood a lot of things, Townie.
This is what I find so humorous about you. You "knew" I was angry? Are you God that you can see into my heart? :chuckle:
It doesn't take anger for me to proclaim a coward a coward, or a clown a clown, or a fool a fool. I call them like I see them...as I always have.
Are you insinuating only a gay would wear a tutu? I've known a lot of gays, and none of them have worn a tutu. A tutu is equated with being a prima donna, and that's how you come across.
Ah, again you claim I sell myself to my "anger". I'm not sure why you think you would reach the level of importance that I could possibly be angry. You're nothing but an internet troll.
I have no idea of what "agreement" you claim I'm supposed to be honoring. What planet do you live on? I can't help it if you fail to act like a manly man. Is that what gets your goat? Good grief....deal with it. You're a whiner. Duh!
You think I'm scathed?I've never really understood why anyone would be upset about someone who dislikes them having a low opinion of them. That's never been my side of this conversation. That's why I could pos rep my stalker now and again when he found something that was funny or insightful.
I already knew you were angry. That's all those words reduce to. So you reach for the gay business because it was the last thing you saw get a rise out of me. Silly business though.
See, it isn't that the gay bit irked me. What irked me was that you do it even though it's a pretty clear violation of the agreement you decided not to honor. And that's the one thing I can't get around, the thing you mistook for something else. That's what was at the heart of the gay bit, not the sexuality. You didn't understand that because you sell yours too cheaply to your anger.
The tutu wearing short guy thinks he can talk about people and they need to let him off unscathed.
What a coward. What a clown. What a fool. What a bully.
And those slippers........ pink satan, are they?
Says the fella who has the lock on being passive-aggressive. :chuckle:
Well, none of that is true, so you're back in form at least.The Townster is getting quite aggravated and upset. He's not his usual sarcastic wisecracking self. Somebody must have found his 'Achilles' heel.'
The Believers Share Their Possessions (Acts 4:31-35)
31 After they prayed, the place where they were meeting was shaken. And they were all filled with the Holy Spirit and spoke the word of God boldly.
32 All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had.
33 With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all
34 that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales
35 and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need.
And you'll never know what that means to me...so it'll have to remain a mystery for you, like grammar.I kind of feel sorry for 'The Townster.'
Well, not all there at any rate. But I appreciate the effort. I can tell you're laboring. Anyone could.However, I'm not quite there yet.
And you'll never know what that means to me...so it'll have to remain a mystery for you, like grammar.
Well, not all there at any rate. But I appreciate the effort. I can tell you're laboring. Anyone could.