So would you characterize "talkorigins" as fallible or infallible?Originally posted by Zakath
Nothing so insidious, :Tye:. It's merely a conveniently available Internet library that may contain info on topics relevant to the discussion at hand.
So would you characterize "talkorigins" as fallible or infallible?Originally posted by Zakath
Nothing so insidious, :Tye:. It's merely a conveniently available Internet library that may contain info on topics relevant to the discussion at hand.
I haven't read all of it, but based on what I've seen, it's merely a collection of material plus archived Usenet postings, none of which qualifies as "infallible" so far as I know...Originally posted by Knight
So would you characterize "talkorigins" as fallible or infallible?
OK.... so how would you determine what IS and what ISN'T fallible at a place like "talkorigins"?Originally posted by Zakath
I haven't read all of it, but based on what I've seen, it's merely a collection of material plus archived Usenet postings, none of which qualifies as "infallible" so far as I know...
Originally posted by Knight
OK.... so how would you determine what IS and what ISN'T fallible at a place like "talkorigins"?
Originally posted by BillyBob
Hey, I just found out that Darwin is my God! :bannana:
"Dear Heavenly Charles, forgive them for they know not what they do. And forgive them for they know not much of anything scientific."
Originally posted by Knight
So would you characterize "talkorigins" as fallible or infallible?
That's odd, I thought he was just a dead naturalist...Originally posted by BillyBob
Hey, I just found out that Darwin is my God! :bannana:
"Dear Heavenly Charles, forgive them for they know not what they do. And forgive them for they know not much of anything scientific."
The fact that you believe Jesus Christ is dead explains why you are an atheistic religionist.Originally posted by Zakath
Of course Tye worships a dead fellow as a deity
HEY AUSSIE THINKER, YOU CAN MAKE $250,000, IT PROBABLY BE EASY FOR YOU.Originally posted by SwItChBlAdE
hey ppl who picked number one.. want to make 250,000 bucks???
http://drdino.com/cse.asp?pg=250k
Prove it.
:nono: :chuckle: :zakath:
I was being sarcastic.:thumb:Originally posted by Berean Todd
:chuckle:
Under 10,000 years old, between 6,000 and 8,000 frankly. As for Clete's question - well, I don't think the scientific evidence will every show or support an earth age of under 10,000 years. However, we can see plenty of evidence that the models they do put forth are complete bunk.
Add that to the incredible evidence for the Bible as the Word of God, and I will put my faith in that which has shown itself to be reliable over the silliness that comes from most of the scientific community.
Frankly, one of the reasons I think the earth shows so much age, is that just as God created Adam fully grown - aged - I believe that He created the earth perfect, and fully developed - aged as it were.
Well, according to your religious book he was killed by the Romans, wasn't he?Originally posted by Tye Porter
The fact that you believe Jesus Christ is dead explains why you are an atheistic religionist.