rainee
New member
Sir,God is not doing anything with whole ethos at a time. The whole of Rom 11 is to show there has always been just a remnant or elect and that's what there will be. 'kai houtos' in 26 (In this way, And so in this manner..." means that's how Israel will be to the end of time. Partly hard. There is the other Israel he's been talking about that will be all saved, but you have to see that he does explain why the ethnos has had such a crummy track record.
God's loving of them does not mean they are going to turn to him. And anyway if "all" Israel was about the ethnos, what good does that do for those in 500 AD or all the other lost generations?
(And I mean that sincerely)
There are the things we know and there are the things we think.
Most heated fights between true believers falls in the "things we think" category.
Prophecy by its very nature is not always totally known nor simply totally what we think.
As I think You have said yourself the very design of Messianic or End of The World prophecies has always been to keep us and/or the evil one from knowing completely. Didn't you say or imply that when you wrote about the flattening?
But we can't fight over what we think just because that is most all we've got completely, ok?
If you say God does not save according to ethos, does this not mean very little? The line of the Messiah shows how God had no problem adding to Israel. But it was Israel none the less, preserved.
But if you say the ones Paul is talking about for the sake of the Fathers doesn't have to be Israel but believers then once again - Paul tells some should be circumcised and some should not in the body of Christ.
He, Paul, who said two become one man, still maintained distinctions.
I say prophecy demands it if we are to understand any of it. Nobody is going to be their own grandpa, so to speak, right?