I wonder how many North Carolinians called the degenerate Mayor of San Franswishco and personally thanked him/her/it?
I wonder how many North Carolinians called the degenerate Mayor of San Franswishco and personally thanked him/her/it?
:idunno: We can buy things from North Carolina. :jump:
The title of this thread is the first step on the journey to ethnic cleansing and a "final solution."
It's what happened to the Jews, the homosexuals, the foreigners, the elderly, misshapen and the destitute.
Identify them as a virus, compare them to vermin, view them as "those OTHER people," register them, put them in railroad cars and then give them a gas shower.
Problem solved.
Cool story.
I guess we better stop making laws about anything, then
Well of course not, just not stupid ones like re-criminalizing homosexuality...
Uncool catch phrase.Cool story.
Because that's the reasonable alternative. Either we recriminalize homosexuality or we stop making laws.I guess we better stop making laws about anything, then
What's stupid is a hundred million people more concerned about 1% of society they aren't even a part of to attack the other hundred million people
There should be law against using other people as an object to bash others with lain:
So...worse than genocide or abortion to your mind. lain: Well, there's nothing like a reasoned perspective and so far...Homosexuality is the final and most egregious immorality a society can commit.
You mean we didn't make them illegal. Alcohol? It can actually be good for you. Smoking...not so much. Adultery isn't criminalized but there are civil penalties for it.We started it by allowing alcohol, then smoking, then other drugs, and then adultery.
Where did you hear that?You ever look at the homosexual arguments in favor saying: Why don't you just ban smoking too?
Homosexuals were fighting for the right that they think means nothing? :think: How does that track? And whoever said it isn't right. Not even a little. That's why people still get married.People defending the gays constantly say that marriage already means nothing in this country. They're right.
What happened to the Romans was largely about inbreeding and bad pipes. Outside of parts of the Appalachians and Michigan, we have the inbreeding/water thing under control...though some find Congress fairly incestuous, metaphorically speaking.This isn't new either, when morals decline society eventually follows. It happened in Lot. It happened in Rome (to the Romans). It's happening here now.
How?They will destroy this society,
I don't watch as much news as I once did. Who have they been bombing or shooting? Where was the last gay looting riot?They are transgressing beyond all bounds.
Because people aren't comfortable accepting that their mate might cheat on them?Why not make adultery culturally acceptable?
Because many a drug is inherently unsafe. Like processed sugar.Why not decriminalize every drug?
Because there's no compelling argument for it. That's just a ballpark answer, mind you. lain:Why not reduce prison sentences regardless of the offense?
So...worse than genocide or abortion to your mind.
We don't actually "allow" adultery. It simply isn't a criminal matter.
Which I didn't really do. Or I did in the sense that were I to make a grocery list I'd be comparing items. lain:There you have it, folks. Comparing abortion with genocide-
The way we jumped all over slavery from the start?but if it were really true, far more would have been done about it.
No, it's on the books in fewer than half and I'll wait while you note the last criminal prosecution for adultery. Between voluntary removal and S.Ct. rulings, that's essentially over with.It's still a crime in half the states. Anywhere between a fine and jail.
The way we jumped all over slavery from the start?
You do realize you're agreeing with my point that upended your earlier one. I mean you should realize that. All sorts of evils can be worked and allowed by a compact for all sorts of reasons. So it doesn't follow that if a thing were truly horrible we'd have done something about it already. Took us a hundred years to undo slavery. How long has Roe been on the books?Yeah, because it was about the welfare of slaves and not the interest of industrialization lain:
You do realize you're agreeing with my point that upended your earlier one. I mean you should realize that. All sorts of evils can be worked and allowed by a compact for all sorts of reasons. So it doesn't follow that if a thing were truly horrible we'd have done something about it already. Took us a hundred years to undo slavery. How long has Roe been on the books?