Balder
New member
Are you wrong when you say "Hinduism has a theological tradition at least as rich and subtle as the Christian one, and arguably richer"?
Are you 5 years old?
Are you wrong when you say "Hinduism has a theological tradition at least as rich and subtle as the Christian one, and arguably richer"?
If you mean that "it is ok to believe whatever you want to believe as long as you are sincere", I must say, "that won't do". While sincerity is a virtue, it is possible to be sincerely wrong and to put your faith in a belief or in someone that cannot save the soul. In effect, you can be worshipping or have faith in idols (false gods). Certain things must be known, understood, and believed for a person to have saving faith.
32.Are you 5 years old?
That won't work. Hindu's are tolerant and allow people to believe whatever they like.That's bull.
I think Hindus should show up and heckel the Christian prayers from now on.
Or just get rid of the prayers alltogether.
Quit talking to your imaginary friends and get to work!
Lazy bums.That won't work. Hindu's are tolerant and allow people to believe whatever they like.
32.
In each instance where you express an opinion, are you right or wrong?
Your thinking is wrong when you make statements like, "I think those who say, "ours is the only way and the only truth," are wrong".Sometimes right, sometimes wrong. What's your point?
Your thinking is wrong when you make statements like, "I think those who say, "ours is the only way and the only truth," are wrong".
What have you got against the possibility that someone may be right and won't abide falsity just because you don't have a firm grasp on what you believe.
I found a vid out on the net on this topic. I read some of the comments left. It appears most of the commenters forgot a few things. Firstly, that the men who founded this nation gave glory to a specific God who granted the rights we have, and the deity wasn't from the hindu pantheon. Secondly, that the "freedom of religion" isn't the only right in the 1st amendment, there is also a freedom of speech. And lastly, that no one was forcing any sort of religion on this hindu fellow. He is free to be a pagan if he likes.
It appears pagans like to forget it's "Christianity" that has allowed the freedom to be a pagan they now enjoy.
Often history's proven we have freedom and liberty despite of religion, certainly not because of it.
Oh. So it's only when christians assert that they are right that you get upset...I do have a clear, firm grasp of what I believe. And I believe that Christian exclusivism and the assumption that Christianity is superior in all regards are both wrong ideas.
Weren't many of the founding fathers were Deists?
If many of the people here at TOL were in charge of setting up the country, the rights and freedoms that were given then would not have been given, I feel certain.
The question is, should the Hindu have been allowed to lead prayer in the Senate?
Those anti-American (and incidentally anti-Christ, since they attempted to impose their religious preferences by force)