B
benstenson
Guest
Hi everyone,
My name is Benjamin (or Ben). I found this site through wiki's open theism page (I think). I'm pretty excited about this open theology stuff. I learned about it recently and have been trying to think it all through and get to the bottom of it.
I don't know how long it would take me to read through the whole Archive thread on open theism so I'll just ask a question here and maybe someone can point me in the right direction?
I think that open theism only makes sense (so far, to me) if time doesn't exist. I've been thinking about what time actually is and I've almost concluded that it is purely a mental/conceptual framework or process. I don't think it is possible to be "inside" or "outside" of time since time is possibly only a label for a class of mental action or something like that. I don't think that objects have to exist within mysterious "dimensions" (which supposedly have some ontological weight) in order to exist, or have length, width, etc. or to move and change. After (or before) all, God lives and changes in the sense of having thought and emotion and volition. I don't think God requires a "dimension" to be alive "in". So why would we?
If time doesn't exist then God cannot be outside of it or transcend it or have experiential knowledge of "the future". He would only anticipate changes via prediction and determination, not through experience. Then, obviously, free will would escape prediction at least in general, and you'd have to choose between fatalism and a living God.
Does anybody already think this or anything like it? Or is this wrong?
I look forward to discussing and appreciate any help with this. Thanks for the opportunity to discuss and sorry to get into so much detail on my intro post if that's against the rules.
Thanks!
Benjamin
My name is Benjamin (or Ben). I found this site through wiki's open theism page (I think). I'm pretty excited about this open theology stuff. I learned about it recently and have been trying to think it all through and get to the bottom of it.
I don't know how long it would take me to read through the whole Archive thread on open theism so I'll just ask a question here and maybe someone can point me in the right direction?
I think that open theism only makes sense (so far, to me) if time doesn't exist. I've been thinking about what time actually is and I've almost concluded that it is purely a mental/conceptual framework or process. I don't think it is possible to be "inside" or "outside" of time since time is possibly only a label for a class of mental action or something like that. I don't think that objects have to exist within mysterious "dimensions" (which supposedly have some ontological weight) in order to exist, or have length, width, etc. or to move and change. After (or before) all, God lives and changes in the sense of having thought and emotion and volition. I don't think God requires a "dimension" to be alive "in". So why would we?
If time doesn't exist then God cannot be outside of it or transcend it or have experiential knowledge of "the future". He would only anticipate changes via prediction and determination, not through experience. Then, obviously, free will would escape prediction at least in general, and you'd have to choose between fatalism and a living God.
Does anybody already think this or anything like it? Or is this wrong?
I look forward to discussing and appreciate any help with this. Thanks for the opportunity to discuss and sorry to get into so much detail on my intro post if that's against the rules.
Thanks!
Benjamin