Why do they have to be in any group?
Um....that's what I believe.
It's you and your fellow MADists who put believers in different groups and eternities.
All believers from Able to you are members of the Body of Christ.
Maybe they believed Jesus was the Son of God, but were not following the Apostles' doctrine nor did they know Paul's gospel yet.
Maybe, but that's not the point, nor the topic.
You go on and on about your two gospels, and your two groups of believers (kingdom and body)
Paul called them Saints, therefore they were believers.
This poses a big problem for your two gospel theory because you can't have believers going from the "kingdom" program to the "body" program, or your theory falls apart.
You also can't have the Roman Saints in your "body" program because you have Paul as member #1 in your "body" program.
Paul makes it clear to the Romans that there were some "in Christ" before he was:
(Rom 16:7 KJV) Salute Andronicus and Junia, my kinsmen, and my fellowprisoners, who are of note among the apostles, who also were in Christ before me.
I am not willing to go beyond what the scripture says about the Romans.
You're not willing to admit that your "two gospel" theory falls apart if you place the Roman Saints in either of your two groups.
I don't have to.
The Romans were believers in the Body of Christ, as are all believers.
The Apostle Paul even tells us that some of them were in Christ before he was.
But that won't stop you and heir from perpetuating your "two gospel" theory.